Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OND vs XLC
OND vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts OND vs XLC
ProShares On-Demand ETF
Price$44.75
Change+$0.12 (+0.27%)
Volume$1.05K
Net Assets6.7M
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$114.69
Change+$0.61 (+0.53%)
Volume$5.32M
Net Assets26.14B
OND vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OND vs. XLC commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OND is a Hold and XLC is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 26.1B vs. OND (6.7M). OND has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: OND (37.018) vs XLC (19.108). OND was incepted earlier than XLC: OND (4 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than OND (0.58). OND has a higher turnover XLC (25.00) vs XLC (25.00).
| OND | XLC | OND / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 37.018 | 19.108 | 194% |
| Net Assets | 6.7M | 26.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.08 | 725% |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 25.00 | 124% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| OND | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
OND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OND has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OND jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OND | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| DASH - OND | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| SPOT - OND | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| EA - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| TTWO - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| SNAP - OND | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| META - XLC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 70% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 69% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| LYV - XLC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||