Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OND vs XLC
OND vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts OND vs XLC
ProShares On-Demand ETF
Price$43.76
Change+$0.31 (+0.71%)
Volume$826
Net Assets6.54M
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$108.20
Change+$0.57 (+0.53%)
Volume$42.63K
Net Assets27.94B
OND vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OND vs. XLC commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OND is a StrongBuy and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 27.9B vs. OND (6.54M). OND has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: OND (33.059) vs XLC (11.776). OND was incepted earlier than XLC: OND (4 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than OND (0.58). OND has a higher turnover XLC (25.00) vs XLC (25.00).
| OND | XLC | OND / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 33.059 | 11.776 | 281% |
| Net Assets | 6.54M | 27.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.08 | 725% |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 25.00 | 124% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| OND | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 12 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 14 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
OND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OND has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OND jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OND | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| DASH - OND | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.35% | ||
| SPOT - OND | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| EA - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| TTWO - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | -4.03% | ||
| SNAP - OND | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| META - XLC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 72% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 72% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 71% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| NWS - XLC | 69% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||