Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OND vs XLC
OND vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts OND vs XLC
ProShares On-Demand ETF
Price$43.84
Change+$0.11 (+0.25%)
Volume$2.08K
Net Assets4.38M
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$106.19
Change-$0.49 (-0.46%)
Volume$5.59M
Net Assets23.66B
OND vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OND vs. XLC commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OND is a Hold and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 23.7B vs. OND (4.38M). OND has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: OND (34.249) vs XLC (10.281). OND was incepted earlier than XLC: OND (4 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than OND (0.58). OND has a higher turnover XLC (25.00) vs XLC (25.00).
| OND | XLC | OND / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 34.249 | 10.281 | 333% |
| Net Assets | 4.38M | 23.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.08 | 725% |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 25.00 | 124% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.98 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| OND | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
OND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OND has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OND jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OND | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| DASH - OND | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| SPOT - OND | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| EA - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| TTWO - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| SNAP - OND | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| META - XLC | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 74% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 74% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| NWS - XLC | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||