OMVJF
Price
$53.62
Change
-$0.61 (-1.12%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
19.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PCCYF
Price
$1.16
Change
+$0.24 (+26.09%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
268.28B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMVJF vs PCCYF

Header iconOMVJF vs PCCYF Comparison
Open Charts OMVJF vs PCCYFBanner chart's image
OMV AG
Price$53.62
Change-$0.61 (-1.12%)
Volume$110
Capitalization19.41B
PetroChina
Price$1.16
Change+$0.24 (+26.09%)
Volume$20.91K
Capitalization268.28B
OMVJF vs PCCYF Comparison Chart in %
OMVJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PCCYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMVJF vs. PCCYF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMVJF is a Hold and PCCYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (OMVJF: $59.70 vs. PCCYF: $1.16)
Brand notoriety: OMVJF and PCCYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMVJF: 230% vs. PCCYF: 56%
Market capitalization -- OMVJF: $19.41B vs. PCCYF: $268.28B
OMVJF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $19.41B. PCCYF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $268.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $600.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $67.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMVJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePCCYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OMVJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PCCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the long-term than OMVJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMVJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCCYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMVJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PCCYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the short-term than OMVJF.

Price Growth

OMVJF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while PCCYF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +7.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-0.41% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCCYF($268B) has a higher market cap than OMVJF($19.4B). OMVJF has higher P/E ratio than PCCYF: OMVJF (14.29) vs PCCYF (9.37). OMVJF (8.545) and PCCYF (8.401) have similar YTD gains . PCCYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 248B vs. OMVJF (7.01B). PCCYF has more cash in the bank: 289B vs. OMVJF (5.69B). OMVJF has less debt than PCCYF: OMVJF (7B) vs PCCYF (359B). PCCYF has higher revenues than OMVJF: PCCYF (2.85T) vs OMVJF (32.6B).
OMVJFPCCYFOMVJF / PCCYF
Capitalization19.4B268B7%
EBITDA7.01B248B3%
Gain YTD8.5458.401102%
P/E Ratio14.299.37153%
Revenue32.6B2.85T1%
Total Cash5.69B289B2%
Total Debt7B359B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMVJF vs PCCYF: Fundamental Ratings
OMVJF
PCCYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
915
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6826
SMR RATING
1..100
7869
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1816
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCCYF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as OMVJF (17). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to OMVJF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMVJF (68). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMVJF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as OMVJF (78). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to OMVJF’s over the last 12 months.

OMVJF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (49). This means that OMVJF’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as OMVJF (18). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to OMVJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMVJFPCCYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMVJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PCCYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOB6.840.45
+7.04%
Mobilicom Limited
TOL146.460.98
+0.67%
Toll Brothers
RARE24.800.04
+0.16%
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical
SIGA6.95N/A
N/A
SIGA Technologies
CMND2.10-0.13
-5.83%
Clearmind Medicine Inc.

OMVJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMVJF and PCCYF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMVJF and PCCYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMVJF
1D Price
Change %
OMVJF100%
N/A
PCCYF - OMVJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.41%
OMVKY - OMVJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
REPYY - OMVJF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
OAOFY - OMVJF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REPYF - OMVJF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More

PCCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCCYF and SHEL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCCYF and SHEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCCYF
1D Price
Change %
PCCYF100%
+7.41%
SHEL - PCCYF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
EQNR - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
SNPMF - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
EC - PCCYF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
BP - PCCYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
More