OMMSF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8.52M
PGLDF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMMSF vs PGLDF

Header iconOMMSF vs PGLDF Comparison
Open Charts OMMSF vs PGLDFBanner chart's image
Omineca Mining & Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$350
Capitalization8.52M
P2 Gold
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$110.16K
Capitalization16M
OMMSF vs PGLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMMSF vs. PGLDF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMMSF is a Hold and PGLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (OMMSF: $0.03 vs. PGLDF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: OMMSF and PGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMMSF: 1% vs. PGLDF: 166%
Market capitalization -- OMMSF: $8.52M vs. PGLDF: $16M
OMMSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.52M. PGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMMSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGLDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OMMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PGLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PGLDF is a better buy in the long-term than OMMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMMSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGLDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMMSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGLDF is a better buy in the short-term than OMMSF.

Price Growth

OMMSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -11.37% price change this week, while PGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGLDF($16M) has a higher market cap than OMMSF($8.52M). PGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 157.590 vs. OMMSF (-53.571). OMMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -983.34K vs. PGLDF (-12.93M). OMMSF (0) and PGLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
OMMSFPGLDFOMMSF / PGLDF
Capitalization8.52M16M53%
EBITDA-983.34K-12.93M8%
Gain YTD-53.571157.590-34%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total CashN/A378K-
Total DebtN/A101K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMMSF: Fundamental Ratings
OMMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMMSFPGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMPX0.06N/A
N/A
LMP Automotive Holdings, Inc.
BLRDF11.50N/A
N/A
Billerud AB
OGFGF6.92N/A
N/A
Origin Energy Ltd.
SGBG10.60N/A
N/A
Signature Bank Georgia Sandy Springs
ALLIF0.09-0.02
-20.83%
Atlantic Lithium Ltd.

OMMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMMSF and BBBXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMMSF and BBBXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMMSF
1D Price
Change %
OMMSF100%
-20.49%
BBBXF - OMMSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.10%
PGLDF - OMMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.79%
FFOXF - OMMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
ORVMF - OMMSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
ORLA - OMMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.49%
More

PGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGLDF and ZCTSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGLDF and ZCTSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGLDF
1D Price
Change %
PGLDF100%
+3.79%
ZCTSF - PGLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVRF - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
ALVLF - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.47%
EOGSF - PGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMGF - PGLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
More