OMMSF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.36M
ORZCF
Price
$1.01
Change
+$0.02 (+2.02%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
597.9M
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMMSF vs ORZCF

Header iconOMMSF vs ORZCF Comparison
Open Charts OMMSF vs ORZCFBanner chart's image
Omineca Mining & Metals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.8K
Capitalization11.36M
Orezone Gold
Price$1.01
Change+$0.02 (+2.02%)
Volume$120.41K
Capitalization597.9M
OMMSF vs ORZCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMMSF vs. ORZCF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMMSF is a Hold and ORZCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (OMMSF: $0.04 vs. ORZCF: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: OMMSF and ORZCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMMSF: 31% vs. ORZCF: 47%
Market capitalization -- OMMSF: $11.36M vs. ORZCF: $597.9M
OMMSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $11.36M. ORZCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $597.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMMSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileORZCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ORZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORZCF is a better buy in the long-term than OMMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMMSF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ORZCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMMSF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ORZCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMMSF is a better buy in the short-term than ORZCF.

Price Growth

OMMSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.50% price change this week, while ORZCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6065.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

ORZCF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ORZCF($598M) has a higher market cap than OMMSF($11.4M). ORZCF YTD gains are higher at: 128.017 vs. OMMSF (-28.321). ORZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 151M vs. OMMSF (-2.18M). ORZCF has more cash in the bank: 72.6M vs. OMMSF (1.25M). OMMSF has less debt than ORZCF: OMMSF (11.1M) vs ORZCF (98.8M). ORZCF has higher revenues than OMMSF: ORZCF (338M) vs OMMSF (0).
OMMSFORZCFOMMSF / ORZCF
Capitalization11.4M598M2%
EBITDA-2.18M151M-1%
Gain YTD-28.321128.017-22%
P/E RatioN/A7.21-
Revenue0338M-
Total Cash1.25M72.6M2%
Total Debt11.1M98.8M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMMSF vs ORZCF: Fundamental Ratings
OMMSF
ORZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
224
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10085
SMR RATING
1..100
9835
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
904

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMMSF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ORZCF (54). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew similarly to ORZCF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as OMMSF (100). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew similarly to OMMSF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMMSF (98). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMMSF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as OMMSF (51). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew similarly to OMMSF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMMSF (100). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMMSFORZCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACIWX13.72N/A
N/A
American Century Global Real Estate G
CFGIX18.57N/A
N/A
Cromwell Foresight Global Infras Instl
HBLAX15.02-0.07
-0.46%
Hartford Balanced Income A
DESCX24.28-0.13
-0.53%
DWS ESG Core Equity C
MMIEX16.68-0.09
-0.54%
MM S&P 500® Index Svc

OMMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMMSF and ORLA have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMMSF and ORLA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMMSF
1D Price
Change %
OMMSF100%
-2.10%
ORLA - OMMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
ORFDF - OMMSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+13.89%
ORZCF - OMMSF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
OPWEF - OMMSF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
PAEKY - OMMSF
-13%
Poorly correlated
N/A

ORZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ORZCF has been loosely correlated with LGDTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ORZCF jumps, then LGDTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORZCF
1D Price
Change %
ORZCF100%
+2.02%
LGDTF - ORZCF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
CPNFF - ORZCF
33%
Poorly correlated
-7.74%
SNWGF - ORZCF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
KNTNF - ORZCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
TORXF - ORZCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
More