OMMSF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.36M
OPWEF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMMSF vs OPWEF

Header iconOMMSF vs OPWEF Comparison
Open Charts OMMSF vs OPWEFBanner chart's image
Omineca Mining & Metals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.8K
Capitalization11.36M
Opawica Explorations
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$3.05K
Capitalization2.13M
OMMSF vs OPWEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMMSF vs. OPWEF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMMSF is a Hold and OPWEF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (OMMSF: $0.04 vs. OPWEF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: OMMSF and OPWEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMMSF: 31% vs. OPWEF: 9%
Market capitalization -- OMMSF: $11.36M vs. OPWEF: $2.13M
OMMSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $11.36M. OPWEF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMMSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOPWEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OPWEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMMSF is a better buy in the long-term than OPWEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMMSF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPWEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMMSF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OPWEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMMSF is a better buy in the short-term than OPWEF.

Price Growth

OMMSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.50% price change this week, while OPWEF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6065.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMMSF($11.4M) has a higher market cap than OPWEF($2.13M). OMMSF YTD gains are higher at: -28.321 vs. OPWEF (-55.663). OPWEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.66M vs. OMMSF (-2.18M). OMMSF has more cash in the bank: 1.25M vs. OPWEF (373K). OMMSF (0) and OPWEF (0) have equivalent revenues.
OMMSFOPWEFOMMSF / OPWEF
Capitalization11.4M2.13M535%
EBITDA-2.18M-1.66M131%
Gain YTD-28.321-55.66351%
P/E RatioN/A8.81-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.25M373K334%
Total Debt11.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMMSF vs OPWEF: Fundamental Ratings
OMMSF
OPWEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
221
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5192
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMMSF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as OPWEF (53). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew similarly to OPWEF’s over the last 12 months.

OMMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OPWEF (100). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew similarly to OPWEF’s over the last 12 months.

OMMSF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as OPWEF (98). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew similarly to OPWEF’s over the last 12 months.

OMMSF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OPWEF (92). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OPWEF’s over the last 12 months.

OMMSF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OPWEF (100). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew similarly to OPWEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMMSFOPWEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACAD21.21-0.05
-0.24%
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals
IRM100.80-0.43
-0.42%
Iron Mountain
BNGO1.71-0.05
-2.84%
Bionano Genomics Inc
ZBIO18.62-1.66
-8.19%
Zenas Biopharma Inc.
CHRS1.45-0.13
-8.23%
Coherus Oncology Inc

OMMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMMSF and ORLA have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMMSF and ORLA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMMSF
1D Price
Change %
OMMSF100%
-2.10%
ORLA - OMMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
ORFDF - OMMSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+13.89%
ORZCF - OMMSF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
OPWEF - OMMSF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
PAEKY - OMMSF
-13%
Poorly correlated
N/A

OPWEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OPWEF and ORZCF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPWEF and ORZCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPWEF
1D Price
Change %
OPWEF100%
-0.40%
ORZCF - OPWEF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
PAEKY - OPWEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORLA - OPWEF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
ORFDF - OPWEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+13.89%
OMMSF - OPWEF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%