Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OMFL vs SPY
OMFL vs SPY Comparison
Open Charts OMFL vs SPY
Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF
Price$59.62
Change-$1.16 (-1.91%)
Volume$2.24K
Net Assets4.92B
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
Price$672.09
Change-$11.29 (-1.65%)
Volume$1.04M
Net Assets702.97B
OMFL vs SPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OMFL vs. SPY commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMFL is a Buy and SPY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPY has more net assets: 703B vs. OMFL (4.92B). SPY has a higher annual dividend yield than OMFL: SPY (17.623) vs OMFL (12.741). OMFL was incepted earlier than SPY: OMFL (8 years) vs SPY (33 years). SPY (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than OMFL (0.29). OMFL has a higher turnover SPY (3.00) vs SPY (3.00).
| OMFL | SPY | OMFL / SPY | |
| Gain YTD | 12.741 | 17.623 | 72% |
| Net Assets | 4.92B | 703B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.09 | 307% |
| Turnover | 267.00 | 3.00 | 8,900% |
| Yield | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| OMFL | SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 23 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
OMFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMFL has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMFL jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMFL | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| APH - OMFL | 86% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| CDW - OMFL | 83% Closely correlated | +3.31% | ||
| ACN - OMFL | 83% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| PAYX - OMFL | 83% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| AAPL - OMFL | 83% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||
SPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPY has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPY jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPY | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| MSFT - SPY | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| AAPL - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| AVGO - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| AMZN - SPY | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| META - SPY | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||