OMF
Price
$54.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
83 days until earnings call
WU
Price
$10.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OMF vs WU

Header iconOMF vs WU Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs WUBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$54.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.23M
CapitalizationN/A
Western Union Company (The)
Price$10.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.58M
CapitalizationN/A
OMF vs WU Comparison Chart
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. WU commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a Hold and WU is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (OMF: $54.64 vs. WU: $10.62)
Brand notoriety: OMF and WU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 97% vs. WU: 81%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $6.02B vs. WU: $4.7B
OMF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.02B. WU’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than WU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than WU.

Price Growth

OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.22% price change this week, while WU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -2.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

WU is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.04% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than WU($4.7B). OMF has higher P/E ratio than WU: OMF (9.44) vs WU (8.18). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 20.679 vs. WU (-5.723). WU has less debt than OMF: WU (2.67B) vs OMF (19.8B). WU (4.36B) and OMF (4.28B) have equivalent revenues.
OMFWUOMF / WU
Capitalization6.02B4.7B128%
EBITDAN/A1.04B-
Gain YTD20.679-5.723-361%
P/E Ratio9.448.18115%
Revenue4.28B4.36B98%
Total CashN/A3.22B-
Total Debt19.8B2.67B742%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs WU: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
WU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1859
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19100
SMR RATING
1..100
812
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4077
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1879
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5023

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (32). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for WU (100). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than WU’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (12). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WU (77). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WU’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WU (79). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFWU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+0.96%
SYF - OMF
69%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
COF - OMF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
SLM - OMF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
DFS - OMF
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
BFH - OMF
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.01%
More

WU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WU has been loosely correlated with OMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WU jumps, then OMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WU
1D Price
Change %
WU100%
+0.09%
OMF - WU
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
SLM - WU
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
PFSI - WU
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
SOFI - WU
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
ENVA - WU
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
More