OMF
Price
$62.61
Change
+$0.58 (+0.94%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.44B
47 days until earnings call
WRLD
Price
$175.76
Change
+$2.88 (+1.67%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
957.15M
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMF vs WRLD

Header iconOMF vs WRLD Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs WRLDBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$62.61
Change+$0.58 (+0.94%)
Volume$706.6K
Capitalization7.44B
World Acceptance
Price$175.76
Change+$2.88 (+1.67%)
Volume$23.05K
Capitalization957.15M
OMF vs WRLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. WRLD commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a StrongBuy and WRLD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $62.61 vs. WRLD: $175.76)
Brand notoriety: OMF and WRLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 69% vs. WRLD: 44%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $7.44B vs. WRLD: $957.15M
OMF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $7.44B. WRLD’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $957.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWRLD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WRLD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than WRLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRLD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WRLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WRLD is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

OMF (@Savings Banks) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while WRLD (@Savings Banks) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

WRLD is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.51% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($7.44B) has a higher market cap than WRLD($957M). WRLD has higher P/E ratio than OMF: WRLD (11.91) vs OMF (11.28). WRLD YTD gains are higher at: 56.314 vs. OMF (27.289). WRLD has less debt than OMF: WRLD (549M) vs OMF (22.1B).
OMFWRLDOMF / WRLD
Capitalization7.44B957M778%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.28956.31448%
P/E Ratio11.2811.9195%
RevenueN/A525M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt22.1B549M4,026%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs WRLD: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
WRLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2524
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1866
SMR RATING
1..100
816
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3321
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (23) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRLD (66). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRLD (66). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WRLD (16). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WRLD (42). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

WRLD's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (33). This means that WRLD’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFWRLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UXOC33.690.36
+1.09%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Uncppd Acceler ETF - Oct
NJUN30.370.09
+0.30%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Jun
AWF11.23-0.01
-0.13%
ALLIANCEBERSTEIN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND
MUE9.53-0.02
-0.21%
Blackrock Muniholdings Quality Fund II
DXD22.85-0.37
-1.59%
ProShares UltraShort Dow30

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+0.94%
ENVA - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
COF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
SYF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
BFH - OMF
75%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
AL - OMF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
More

WRLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRLD has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WRLD jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRLD
1D Price
Change %
WRLD100%
+1.67%
ENVA - WRLD
73%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
OMF - WRLD
67%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
NAVI - WRLD
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
BFH - WRLD
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
COF - WRLD
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
More