OMF
Price
$56.65
Change
+$0.47 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
23 days until earnings call
WRLD
Price
$169.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
881.52M
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMF vs WRLD

Header iconOMF vs WRLD Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs WRLDBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$56.65
Change+$0.47 (+0.84%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization6.02B
World Acceptance
Price$169.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$70.35K
Capitalization881.52M
OMF vs WRLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. WRLD commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a Buy and WRLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $56.65 vs. WRLD: $169.10)
Brand notoriety: OMF and WRLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 119% vs. WRLD: 166%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $6.02B vs. WRLD: $881.52M
OMF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.02B. WRLD’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $881.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWRLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WRLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than WRLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRLD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WRLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than WRLD.

Price Growth

OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +4.71% price change this week, while WRLD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +7.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

WRLD is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than WRLD($882M). WRLD has higher P/E ratio than OMF: WRLD (12.23) vs OMF (9.44). WRLD YTD gains are higher at: 50.391 vs. OMF (13.051). WRLD has less debt than OMF: WRLD (667M) vs OMF (19.8B). OMF has higher revenues than WRLD: OMF (4.28B) vs WRLD (526M).
OMFWRLDOMF / WRLD
Capitalization6.02B882M682%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.05150.39126%
P/E Ratio9.4412.2377%
Revenue4.28B526M814%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt19.8B667M2,969%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs WRLD: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
WRLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1861
SMR RATING
1..100
713
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2439
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRLD (75). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRLD (61). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WRLD (13). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

WRLD's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (44). This means that WRLD’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WRLD (39). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WRLD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFWRLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CICEX62.120.40
+0.65%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer 529E
FEIFX32.800.16
+0.49%
Franklin Equity Income Adv
ETNDX19.370.08
+0.44%
Eventide Dividend Growth N
TWEBX18.810.08
+0.43%
Tweedy, Browne Value
MLOAX8.63-0.03
-0.35%
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy A

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+0.84%
ENVA - OMF
83%
Closely correlated
+5.17%
COF - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
AXP - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
SLM - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
BFH - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
More

WRLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRLD has been loosely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRLD jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRLD
1D Price
Change %
WRLD100%
N/A
ENVA - WRLD
65%
Loosely correlated
+5.17%
OMF - WRLD
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
URI - WRLD
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
COF - WRLD
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
SYF - WRLD
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More