OMF
Price
$56.65
Change
+$0.47 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
24 days until earnings call
WD
Price
$70.53
Change
+$0.21 (+0.30%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.4B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMF vs WD

Header iconOMF vs WD Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs WDBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$56.65
Change+$0.47 (+0.84%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization6.02B
Walker & Dunlop
Price$70.53
Change+$0.21 (+0.30%)
Volume$962.99K
Capitalization3.4B
OMF vs WD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. WD commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a Buy and WD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $56.65 vs. WD: $70.53)
Brand notoriety: OMF and WD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 119% vs. WD: 403%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $6.02B vs. WD: $3.4B
OMF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.02B. WD’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $3.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than WD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than WD.

Price Growth

OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +4.71% price change this week, while WD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +5.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

WD is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than WD($3.4B). WD has higher P/E ratio than OMF: WD (31.03) vs OMF (9.44). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 13.051 vs. WD (-26.201). WD has less debt than OMF: WD (1.47B) vs OMF (19.8B). OMF has higher revenues than WD: OMF (4.28B) vs WD (1.05B).
OMFWDOMF / WD
Capitalization6.02B3.4B177%
EBITDAN/A364M-
Gain YTD13.051-26.201-50%
P/E Ratio9.4431.0330%
Revenue4.28B1.05B406%
Total CashN/A329M-
Total Debt19.8B1.47B1,346%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs WD: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
WD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1811
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1867
SMR RATING
1..100
782
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2486
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WD (26). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WD (67). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for WD (82). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than WD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WD (63). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WD’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WD (86). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFWD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTECX14.940.08
+0.54%
Baron Technology Institutional
OIRDX27.430.13
+0.48%
Invesco Rising Dividends R6
FNEEX67.880.30
+0.44%
American Funds New Economy 529-F-2
APHQX15.380.06
+0.39%
Artisan Mid Cap Value Institutional
APSRX15.940.04
+0.25%
NYLI Fiera SMID Growth Class A

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+0.84%
ENVA - OMF
83%
Closely correlated
+5.17%
COF - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
AXP - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
SLM - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
BFH - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
More

WD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WD has been loosely correlated with URI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WD jumps, then URI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WD
1D Price
Change %
WD100%
+0.30%
URI - WD
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
PFSI - WD
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
ENVA - WD
59%
Loosely correlated
+5.17%
R - WD
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
OMF - WD
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
More