OMF
Price
$55.83
Change
+$0.22 (+0.40%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
6.64B
72 days until earnings call
SLM
Price
$31.89
Change
+$0.33 (+1.05%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
6.65B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMF vs SLM

Header iconOMF vs SLM Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs SLMBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$55.83
Change+$0.22 (+0.40%)
Volume$472.37K
Capitalization6.64B
SLM
Price$31.89
Change+$0.33 (+1.05%)
Volume$876.27K
Capitalization6.65B
OMF vs SLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. SLM commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a Hold and SLM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $55.83 vs. SLM: $31.89)
Brand notoriety: OMF: Not notable vs. SLM: Notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 46% vs. SLM: 42%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $6.64B vs. SLM: $6.65B
OMF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $6.64B. SLM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $6.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $653.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than SLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than SLM.

Price Growth

OMF (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.17% price change this week, while SLM (@Savings Banks) price change was +2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

SLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.12% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLM($6.65B) and OMF($6.64B) have the same market capitalization . SLM has higher P/E ratio than OMF: SLM (15.48) vs OMF (10.06). SLM YTD gains are higher at: 16.617 vs. OMF (13.505). SLM has less debt than OMF: SLM (6.41B) vs OMF (22.1B).
OMFSLMOMF / SLM
Capitalization6.64B6.65B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.50516.61781%
P/E Ratio10.0615.4865%
RevenueN/A1.76B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt22.1B6.41B345%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs SLM: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
SLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
199
SMR RATING
1..100
811
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
416
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLM (76). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLM’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (19). This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SLM (11). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SLM (49). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMF (41). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSTSX300.021.99
+0.67%
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Sel
COAVX13.880.08
+0.58%
Columbia Overseas Value A
LONGX14.580.05
+0.34%
Longboard I
TTISX13.31-0.03
-0.22%
Nuveen Quant Intl Sm Cap Eq Retirement
FSRFX101.47-0.68
-0.67%
Fidelity Select Transportation

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+0.40%
ENVA - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
COF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
SYF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
SLM - OMF
74%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
BFH - OMF
74%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
More

SLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLM has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLM jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLM
1D Price
Change %
SLM100%
+1.05%
SYF - SLM
78%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
OMF - SLM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
AXP - SLM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
COF - SLM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
NAVI - SLM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
More