OMF
Price
$62.61
Change
+$0.58 (+0.94%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.44B
47 days until earnings call
SEZL
Price
$84.89
Change
-$3.15 (-3.58%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.89B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMF vs SEZL

Header iconOMF vs SEZL Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs SEZLBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$62.61
Change+$0.58 (+0.94%)
Volume$706.6K
Capitalization7.44B
Sezzle
Price$84.89
Change-$3.15 (-3.58%)
Volume$963.86K
Capitalization2.89B
OMF vs SEZL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEZL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. SEZL commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a StrongBuy and SEZL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $62.61 vs. SEZL: $84.89)
Brand notoriety: OMF and SEZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 69% vs. SEZL: 85%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $7.44B vs. SEZL: $2.89B
OMF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $7.44B. SEZL’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $2.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSEZL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SEZL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than SEZL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEZL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SEZL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OMF and SEZL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OMF (@Savings Banks) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while SEZL (@Savings Banks) price change was -11.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

SEZL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.51% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($7.44B) has a higher market cap than SEZL($2.89B). SEZL has higher P/E ratio than OMF: SEZL (28.89) vs OMF (11.28). SEZL YTD gains are higher at: 99.116 vs. OMF (27.289). SEZL has less debt than OMF: SEZL (131M) vs OMF (22.1B).
OMFSEZLOMF / SEZL
Capitalization7.44B2.89B258%
EBITDAN/A139M-
Gain YTD27.28999.11628%
P/E Ratio11.2828.8939%
RevenueN/A372M-
Total CashN/A88.9M-
Total Debt22.1B131M16,870%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFSEZL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEZL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UXOC33.690.36
+1.09%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Uncppd Acceler ETF - Oct
NJUN30.370.09
+0.30%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Jun
AWF11.23-0.01
-0.13%
ALLIANCEBERSTEIN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND
MUE9.53-0.02
-0.21%
Blackrock Muniholdings Quality Fund II
DXD22.85-0.37
-1.59%
ProShares UltraShort Dow30

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+0.94%
ENVA - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
COF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
SYF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
BFH - OMF
75%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
AL - OMF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
More

SEZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEZL has been loosely correlated with UPST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEZL jumps, then UPST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEZL
1D Price
Change %
SEZL100%
-3.58%
UPST - SEZL
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
SOFI - SEZL
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.63%
PMTS - SEZL
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
URI - SEZL
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
OMF - SEZL
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
More