OMF
Price
$69.19
Change
+$0.22 (+0.32%)
Updated
Dec 26, 02:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.12B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RM
Price
$40.55
Change
+$0.36 (+0.90%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
393.85M
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMF vs RM

Header iconOMF vs RM Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs RMBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$69.19
Change+$0.22 (+0.32%)
Volume$300
Capitalization8.12B
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$40.55
Change+$0.36 (+0.90%)
Volume$39.95K
Capitalization393.85M
OMF vs RM Comparison Chart in %
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. RM commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a StrongBuy and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $68.97 vs. RM: $40.55)
Brand notoriety: OMF and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 25% vs. RM: 79%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $8.12B vs. RM: $393.85M
OMF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $8.12B. RM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $393.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $684.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $23.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

OMF (@Savings Banks) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while RM (@Savings Banks) price change was +4.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

RM is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.74% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($8.12B) has a higher market cap than RM($394M). OMF has higher P/E ratio than RM: OMF (11.69) vs RM (9.82). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 42.708 vs. RM (22.591). RM has less debt than OMF: RM (1.62B) vs OMF (22.3B). OMF has higher revenues than RM: OMF (4.87B) vs RM (549M).
OMFRMOMF / RM
Capitalization8.12B394M2,061%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD42.70822.591189%
P/E Ratio11.699.82119%
Revenue4.87B549M887%
Total CashN/A4.16M-
Total Debt22.3B1.62B1,379%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1967
SMR RATING
1..100
817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4885
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (25) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (33). This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (67). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (17). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (45). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (85). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIGUX22.850.11
+0.48%
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income R6
MPSSX16.090.05
+0.31%
BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy M
USLYX56.510.13
+0.23%
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R2
RPBAX28.550.05
+0.18%
T. Rowe Price Balanced
QDISX19.01N/A
N/A
FI Instl Group Stock for Ret Plns

RM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RM has been loosely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RM jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RM
1D Price
Change %
RM100%
+0.90%
ENVA - RM
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
OMF - RM
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
ALLY - RM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
ATLC - RM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
SYF - RM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More