OMF
Price
$54.17
Change
-$1.83 (-3.27%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
59 days until earnings call
R
Price
$164.95
Change
-$1.12 (-0.67%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.32B
59 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OMF vs R

Header iconOMF vs R Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs RBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$54.17
Change-$1.83 (-3.27%)
Volume$856.29K
Capitalization6.02B
Ryder System
Price$164.95
Change-$1.12 (-0.67%)
Volume$576.12K
Capitalization5.32B
OMF vs R Comparison Chart
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. R commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a Hold and R is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $57.69 vs. R: $170.92)
Brand notoriety: OMF and R are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 116% vs. R: 168%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $6.02B vs. R: $5.32B
OMF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.02B. R’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • R’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than R.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while R’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • R’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OMF and R are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +3.63% price change this week, while R (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +8.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

R is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-1.24% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than R($5.32B). R has higher P/E ratio than OMF: R (13.76) vs OMF (9.44). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 12.733 vs. R (9.497). R has less debt than OMF: R (8.15B) vs OMF (19.8B). R has higher revenues than OMF: R (11.8B) vs OMF (4.28B).
OMFROMF / R
Capitalization6.02B5.32B113%
EBITDAN/A2.73B-
Gain YTD12.7339.497134%
P/E Ratio9.4413.7669%
Revenue4.28B11.8B36%
Total CashN/A204M-
Total Debt19.8B8.15B243%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs R: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
R
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8075
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
192
SMR RATING
1..100
755
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1630
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as R (28). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to R’s over the last 12 months.

R's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (19). This means that R’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for R (55). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than R’s over the last 12 months.

R's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (43). This means that R’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as R (30). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to R’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then COF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+1.28%
COF - OMF
72%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
SYF - OMF
69%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
DFS - OMF
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
SLM - OMF
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.53%
AXP - OMF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
More

R and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, R has been loosely correlated with URI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if R jumps, then URI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To R
1D Price
Change %
R100%
+3.26%
URI - R
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
AXP - R
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
OMF - R
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
SYF - R
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
AL - R
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
More