OMF
Price
$62.03
Change
+$0.92 (+1.51%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.37B
48 days until earnings call
PYPL
Price
$69.64
Change
+$0.39 (+0.56%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
66.53B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMF vs PYPL

Header iconOMF vs PYPL Comparison
Open Charts OMF vs PYPLBanner chart's image
OneMain Holdings
Price$62.03
Change+$0.92 (+1.51%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization7.37B
PayPal Holdings
Price$69.64
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
Volume$11.81M
Capitalization66.53B
OMF vs PYPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. PYPL commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a StrongBuy and PYPL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (OMF: $62.03 vs. PYPL: $69.64)
Brand notoriety: OMF: Not notable vs. PYPL: Notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 106% vs. PYPL: 110%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $7.37B vs. PYPL: $66.53B
OMF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $7.37B. PYPL’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $66.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePYPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than PYPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PYPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PYPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PYPL is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

OMF (@Savings Banks) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while PYPL (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

PYPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.47% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYPL($66.5B) has a higher market cap than OMF($7.37B). PYPL has higher P/E ratio than OMF: PYPL (14.91) vs OMF (11.18). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 26.110 vs. PYPL (-18.407). PYPL has less debt than OMF: PYPL (11.3B) vs OMF (22.1B).
OMFPYPLOMF / PYPL
Capitalization7.37B66.5B11%
EBITDAN/A7.26B-
Gain YTD26.110-18.407-142%
P/E Ratio11.1814.9175%
RevenueN/A32.3B-
Total CashN/A10B-
Total Debt22.1B11.3B196%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs PYPL: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
PYPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2558
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19100
SMR RATING
1..100
841
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3568
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (83) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYPL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (41) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (58) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (68) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFPYPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NETL24.720.09
+0.37%
Fundamental Income Net Lease Rl Estt ETF
ILS20.190.05
+0.26%
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF
DUSA47.84-0.02
-0.04%
Davis Select US Equity ETF
SIXL36.99-0.02
-0.07%
ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Eq Strat ETF
XLE88.49-2.03
-2.24%
The Energy Select Sector SPDR® ETF

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+1.51%
ENVA - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
COF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
SYF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
BFH - OMF
75%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
AL - OMF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
More

PYPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYPL has been loosely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PYPL jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYPL
1D Price
Change %
PYPL100%
+0.56%
SYF - PYPL
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
AXP - PYPL
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
COF - PYPL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
AL - PYPL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
OMF - PYPL
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
More