OMCC
Price
$4.95
Change
+$0.07 (+1.43%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.14M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SEZL
Price
$66.71
Change
+$2.27 (+3.52%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.2B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMCC vs SEZL

Header iconOMCC vs SEZL Comparison
Open Charts OMCC vs SEZLBanner chart's image
Old Market Capital
Price$4.95
Change+$0.07 (+1.43%)
Volume$200
Capitalization33.14M
Sezzle
Price$66.71
Change+$2.27 (+3.52%)
Volume$13.9K
Capitalization2.2B
OMCC vs SEZL Comparison Chart in %
OMCC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SEZL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMCC vs. SEZL commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMCC is a Hold and SEZL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (OMCC: $4.88 vs. SEZL: $64.44)
Brand notoriety: OMCC and SEZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMCC: 68% vs. SEZL: 77%
Market capitalization -- OMCC: $33.14M vs. SEZL: $2.2B
OMCC [@Savings Banks] is valued at $33.14M. SEZL’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $636.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEZL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OMCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEZL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OMCC and SEZL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEZL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SEZL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEZL is a better buy in the short-term than OMCC.

Price Growth

OMCC (@Savings Banks) experienced а -3.17% price change this week, while SEZL (@Savings Banks) price change was +9.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEZL is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.26% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEZL($2.2B) has a higher market cap than OMCC($33.1M). SEZL YTD gains are higher at: 51.149 vs. OMCC (-23.988). SEZL has more cash in the bank: 88.9M vs. OMCC (7.82M). OMCC has less debt than SEZL: OMCC (4.58M) vs SEZL (131M). SEZL has higher revenues than OMCC: SEZL (372M) vs OMCC (13.1M).
OMCCSEZLOMCC / SEZL
Capitalization33.1M2.2B2%
EBITDAN/A139M-
Gain YTD-23.98851.149-47%
P/E RatioN/A19.84-
Revenue13.1M372M4%
Total Cash7.82M88.9M9%
Total Debt4.58M131M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMCC: Fundamental Ratings
OMCC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMCCSEZL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMCC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SEZL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSLIX47.380.77
+1.65%
Hartford Small Cap Growth I
PWDAX10.600.12
+1.15%
DF Tactical Dividend Fund A
PUGCX17.190.11
+0.64%
Putnam Focused International Equity C
VGWAX35.710.20
+0.56%
Vanguard Global Wellington Admiral
PAIGX24.040.11
+0.46%
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq Adv

OMCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMCC and VSTS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMCC and VSTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMCC
1D Price
Change %
OMCC100%
+4.72%
VSTS - OMCC
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
BBDC - OMCC
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
LC - OMCC
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
ATLCP - OMCC
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
SEZL - OMCC
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.53%
More

SEZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEZL has been loosely correlated with UPST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEZL jumps, then UPST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEZL
1D Price
Change %
SEZL100%
+7.53%
UPST - SEZL
53%
Loosely correlated
+6.09%
PMTS - SEZL
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
AXP - SEZL
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
OMF - SEZL
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
SOFI - SEZL
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More