OMCC
Price
$5.17
Change
-$0.24 (-4.44%)
Updated
Jun 30, 11:35 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.1M
SEZL
Price
$178.11
Change
+$12.71 (+7.68%)
Updated
Jun 30, 03:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
475.95M
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMCC vs SEZL

Header iconOMCC vs SEZL Comparison
Open Charts OMCC vs SEZLBanner chart's image
Old Market Capital
Price$5.17
Change-$0.24 (-4.44%)
Volume$100
Capitalization49.1M
Sezzle
Price$178.11
Change+$12.71 (+7.68%)
Volume$100
Capitalization475.95M
OMCC vs SEZL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEZL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMCC vs. SEZL commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMCC is a Hold and SEZL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (OMCC: $5.40 vs. SEZL: $165.40)
Brand notoriety: OMCC and SEZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMCC: 130% vs. SEZL: 100%
Market capitalization -- OMCC: $49.1M vs. SEZL: $475.95M
OMCC [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $49.1M. SEZL’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $475.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEZL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OMCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEZL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEZL is a better buy in the long-term than OMCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEZL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SEZL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMCC is a better buy in the short-term than SEZL.

Price Growth

OMCC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while SEZL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +12.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEZL is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.58% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEZL($476M) has a higher market cap than OMCC($49.1M). SEZL has higher P/E ratio than OMCC: SEZL (54.63) vs OMCC (24.10). SEZL YTD gains are higher at: 287.959 vs. OMCC (-15.888). SEZL has more cash in the bank: 67.6M vs. OMCC (4.72M). OMCC has less debt than SEZL: OMCC (0) vs SEZL (95.7M). SEZL has higher revenues than OMCC: SEZL (159M) vs OMCC (2M).
OMCCSEZLOMCC / SEZL
Capitalization49.1M476M10%
EBITDAN/A24.5M-
Gain YTD-15.888287.959-6%
P/E Ratio24.1054.6344%
Revenue2M159M1%
Total Cash4.72M67.6M7%
Total Debt095.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMCC: Fundamental Ratings
OMCC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMCCSEZL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEZL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XPL0.690.03
+4.69%
Solitario Resources Corp
NWBI12.84N/A
N/A
Northwest Bancshares
CHOLF0.77N/A
N/A
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
NE26.75-0.16
-0.59%
Noble Corp
COOK1.69-0.05
-2.87%
Traeger

OMCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMCC and VSTS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMCC and VSTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMCC
1D Price
Change %
OMCC100%
+1.12%
VSTS - OMCC
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
WD - OMCC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
SEZL - OMCC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
ALLY - OMCC
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
UHAL - OMCC
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
More

SEZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEZL has been loosely correlated with UPST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEZL jumps, then UPST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEZL
1D Price
Change %
SEZL100%
+0.76%
UPST - SEZL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
SOFI - SEZL
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
AXP - SEZL
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATLC - SEZL
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OMF - SEZL
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
More