Advertisement
OMAB vs PAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMAB is a Hold and PAC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OMAB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- OMAB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OMAB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OMAB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
OMAB (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -5.20% price change this week, while PAC (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -1.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Air Freight/Couriers (+1.16% weekly)The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
| OMAB | PAC | OMAB / PAC | |
| Capitalization | 5.12B | 13.3B | 38% |
| EBITDA | 10B | 22.1B | 45% |
| Gain YTD | -2.216 | -0.163 | 1,358% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.18 | 23.44 | 73% |
| Revenue | 16B | 41.1B | 39% |
| Total Cash | 4.45B | 11.7B | 38% |
| Total Debt | 13.6B | N/A | - |
OMAB | PAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 8 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OMAB's Valuation (68) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (79). This means that OMAB’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as OMAB (25). This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to OMAB’s over the last 12 months.
OMAB's SMR Rating (18) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (19). This means that OMAB’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as OMAB (50). This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to OMAB’s over the last 12 months.
OMAB's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (48). This means that OMAB’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.
| OMAB | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 71% | 8 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 70% |
Advertisement
OMAB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMAB has been closely correlated with PAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMAB jumps, then PAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OMAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAB | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| PAC - OMAB | 73% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| ASR - OMAB | 70% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| CAAP - OMAB | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| ASRMF - OMAB | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
| GPAEF - OMAB | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| OMAB - PAC | 73% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| ASR - PAC | 71% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| CAAP - PAC | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| ASRMF - PAC | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
| GPAEF - PAC | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||