OLO
Price
$6.08
Change
+$0.09 (+1.51%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
888.81M
62 days until earnings call
WK
Price
$84.90
Change
-$0.21 (-0.25%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.64B
55 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OLO vs WK

Header iconOLO vs WK Comparison
Open Charts OLO vs WKBanner chart's image
Olo
Price$6.08
Change+$0.09 (+1.51%)
Volume$10.93K
Capitalization888.81M
Workiva
Price$84.90
Change-$0.21 (-0.25%)
Volume$3.47K
Capitalization4.64B
OLO vs WK Comparison Chart
Loading...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OLO vs. WK commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OLO is a Hold and WK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (OLO: $5.98 vs. WK: $85.11)
Brand notoriety: OLO and WK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OLO: 159% vs. WK: 90%
Market capitalization -- OLO: $888.81M vs. WK: $4.64B
OLO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $888.81M. WK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the long-term than WK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OLO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OLO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WK is a better buy in the short-term than OLO.

Price Growth

OLO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.53% price change this week, while WK (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLO is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

WK is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-3.30% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WK($4.64B) has a higher market cap than OLO($889M). OLO (-22.135) and WK (-22.274) have similar YTD gains . OLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -47.56M vs. WK (-59.32M). WK has more cash in the bank: 814M vs. OLO (363M). OLO has less debt than WK: OLO (18.9M) vs WK (793M). WK has higher revenues than OLO: WK (630M) vs OLO (228M).
OLOWKOLO / WK
Capitalization889M4.64B19%
EBITDA-47.56M-59.32M80%
Gain YTD-22.135-22.27499%
P/E Ratio9.87N/A-
Revenue228M630M36%
Total Cash363M814M45%
Total Debt18.9M793M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OLO vs WK: Fundamental Ratings
OLO
WK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5159
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10061
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9392
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
81n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLO's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WK (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew significantly faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

WK's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLO (100) in the null industry. This means that WK’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLO’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as WK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

WK's Price Growth Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as OLO (93) in the null industry. This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

WK's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as OLO (100) in the null industry. This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OLOWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X78532.000000-2069.039000
-2.57%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY560.58-15.34
-2.66%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL227.48-11.59
-4.85%
Apple
GME22.42-1.58
-6.58%
GameStop Corp
TSLA222.15-40.52
-15.43%
Tesla

OLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLO
1D Price
Change %
OLO100%
-7.29%
WRDLY - OLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
ACIW - OLO
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
SDGR - OLO
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.04%
WK - OLO
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
QTWO - OLO
42%
Loosely correlated
-5.97%
More

WK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WK has been loosely correlated with TDOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WK jumps, then TDOC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WK
1D Price
Change %
WK100%
-0.89%
TDOC - WK
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
AGYS - WK
50%
Loosely correlated
-5.19%
BL - WK
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
OLO - WK
45%
Loosely correlated
-7.29%
QTWO - WK
45%
Loosely correlated
-5.97%
More