OLO
Price
$7.74
Change
+$0.20 (+2.65%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
888.81M
32 days until earnings call
SQ
Price
$86.96
Change
+$0.58 (+0.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
52.08B
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OLO vs SQ

Header iconOLO vs SQ Comparison
Open Charts OLO vs SQBanner chart's image
Olo
Price$7.74
Change+$0.20 (+2.65%)
Volume$1.26M
Capitalization888.81M
Block
Price$86.96
Change+$0.58 (+0.67%)
Volume$5.8M
Capitalization52.08B
OLO vs SQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OLO vs. SQ commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OLO is a Hold and SQ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (OLO: $7.74 vs. SQ: $86.96)
Brand notoriety: OLO: Not notable vs. SQ: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OLO: 85% vs. SQ: 72%
Market capitalization -- OLO: $888.81M vs. SQ: $52.08B
OLO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $888.81M. SQ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $52.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the long-term than SQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OLO is a better buy in the short-term than SQ.

Price Growth

OLO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.76% price change this week, while SQ (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLO is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

SQ is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SQ($52.1B) has a higher market cap than OLO($889M). SQ has higher P/E ratio than OLO: SQ (4073.00) vs OLO (9.87). SQ YTD gains are higher at: 2.318 vs. OLO (0.781). SQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 790M vs. OLO (-47.56M). SQ has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. OLO (363M). OLO has less debt than SQ: OLO (18.9M) vs SQ (6.07B). SQ has higher revenues than OLO: SQ (21.9B) vs OLO (228M).
OLOSQOLO / SQ
Capitalization889M52.1B2%
EBITDA-47.56M790M-6%
Gain YTD0.7812.31834%
P/E Ratio9.874073.000%
Revenue228M21.9B1%
Total Cash363M9.02B4%
Total Debt18.9M6.07B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OLO vs SQ: Fundamental Ratings
OLO
SQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7171
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9186
SMR RATING
1..100
9082
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLO's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SQ (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SQ’s over the last 12 months.

SQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as OLO (91) in the null industry. This means that SQ’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

SQ's SMR Rating (82) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as OLO (90) in the null industry. This means that SQ’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SQ (44) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to SQ’s over the last 12 months.

OLO's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SQ (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to SQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OLOSQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X104462.0400004705.133000
+4.72%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

OLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLO
1D Price
Change %
OLO100%
+2.65%
WRDLY - OLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
ACIW - OLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
SDGR - OLO
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
EVCM - OLO
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
EEFT - OLO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
More

SQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQ has been loosely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SQ jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQ
1D Price
Change %
SQ100%
+0.67%
AFRM - SQ
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
BILL - SQ
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
SSNC - SQ
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
QTWO - SQ
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
OLO - SQ
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.65%
More