Advertisement
OLO vs SEAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OLO is a Buy and SEAC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OLO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSEAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- OLO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SEAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OLO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OLO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SEAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
OLO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.11% price change this week, while SEAC (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
OLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+3.75% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| OLO | SEAC | OLO / SEAC | |
| Capitalization | 889M | 12.6M | 7,056% |
| EBITDA | -47.56M | 626K | -7,598% |
| Gain YTD | 12.240 | -28.462 | -43% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.87 | 0.58 | 1,690% |
| Revenue | 228M | 32.8M | 695% |
| Total Cash | 363M | 15.2M | 2,388% |
| Total Debt | 18.9M | 1.22M | 1,556% |
OLO | SEAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SEAC's Valuation (41) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLO (81) in the null industry. This means that SEAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLO’s over the last 12 months.
OLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SEAC (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
OLO's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as SEAC (95) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
OLO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEAC (88) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
OLO's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SEAC (65) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
| OLO | SEAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CLTAX | 15.91 | 0.14 | +0.89% |
| Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation A | |||
| AMEIX | 34.71 | 0.24 | +0.70% |
| American Century Equity Growth I | |||
| EMEAX | 12.92 | 0.09 | +0.70% |
| Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A | |||
| PZFVX | 24.78 | 0.08 | +0.32% |
| JHancock Classic Value A | |||
| AMVYX | 15.81 | 0.03 | +0.19% |
| American Century Mid Cap Value Y | |||
OLO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLO | 100% | -1.60% | ||
| QTWO - OLO | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| WRDLY - OLO | 52% Loosely correlated | -9.69% | ||
| EVCM - OLO | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| AMPL - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| SHOP - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
SEAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SEAC and ALIT have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEAC and ALIT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEAC | 100% | +2.20% | ||
| ALIT - SEAC | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
| DBX - SEAC | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
| ALLT - SEAC | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
| PAR - SEAC | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.13% | ||
| OLO - SEAC | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.60% | ||
More | ||||