OLB
Price
$1.75
Change
+$0.01 (+0.57%)
Updated
Dec 18, 02:40 PM (EDT)
SMSI
Price
$0.98
Change
-$0.02 (-2.00%)
Updated
Dec 18, 03:42 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

OLB vs SMSI

Header iconOLB vs SMSI Comparison
Open Charts OLB vs SMSIBanner chart's image
OLB Group Inc. (The)
Price$1.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.57%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Smith Micro Software
Price$0.98
Change-$0.02 (-2.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
OLB vs SMSI Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OLB vs. SMSI commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OLB is a Hold and SMSI is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (OLB: $1.74 vs. SMSI: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: OLB and SMSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OLB: 42% vs. SMSI: 499%
Market capitalization -- OLB: $10.33M vs. SMSI: $25.49M
OLB [@Packaged Software] is valued at $10.33M. SMSI’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OLB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OLB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMSI is a better buy in the long-term than OLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMSI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMSI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

OLB (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.45% price change this week, while SMSI (@Packaged Software) price change was +34.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLB is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2024.

SMSI is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.29% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMSI($25.5M) has a higher market cap than OLB($10.3M). OLB (-83.585) and SMSI (-84.911) have similar YTD gains . OLB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -812.6K vs. SMSI (-10.49M). SMSI has more cash in the bank: 7.13M vs. OLB (87.8K). OLB has less debt than SMSI: OLB (351K) vs SMSI (3.26M). SMSI has higher revenues than OLB: SMSI (40.9M) vs OLB (31.6M).
OLBSMSIOLB / SMSI
Capitalization10.3M25.5M40%
EBITDA-812.6K-10.49M8%
Gain YTD-83.585-84.91198%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue31.6M40.9M77%
Total Cash87.8K7.13M1%
Total Debt351K3.26M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OLB vs SMSI: Fundamental Ratings
OLB
SMSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
970
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8965
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLB's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMSI (61) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OLB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMSI’s over the last 12 months.

OLB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSI (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OLB’s stock grew similarly to SMSI’s over the last 12 months.

OLB's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSI (97) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OLB’s stock grew similarly to SMSI’s over the last 12 months.

SMSI's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as OLB (89) in the null industry. This means that SMSI’s stock grew similarly to OLB’s over the last 12 months.

SMSI's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLB (100) in the null industry. This means that SMSI’s stock grew significantly faster than OLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

OLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLB has been closely correlated with SOPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OLB jumps, then SOPA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLB
1D Price
Change %
OLB100%
+1.16%
SOPA - OLB
86%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
SMSI - OLB
85%
Closely correlated
+13.95%
MYSZ - OLB
83%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
MRIN - OLB
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
GRRR - OLB
75%
Closely correlated
+11.60%
More

SMSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMSI has been closely correlated with SOPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMSI jumps, then SOPA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSI
1D Price
Change %
SMSI100%
+13.95%
SOPA - SMSI
85%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
OLB - SMSI
85%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
MYSZ - SMSI
85%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
BKKT - SMSI
85%
Closely correlated
-5.67%
MRIN - SMSI
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
More