OILCF
Price
$3.63
Change
-$0.06 (-1.63%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.88M
WDS
Price
$16.35
Change
-$0.30 (-1.80%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
31.8B
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OILCF vs WDS

Header iconOILCF vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts OILCF vs WDSBanner chart's image
Permex Petroleum
Price$3.63
Change-$0.06 (-1.63%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization1.88M
Woodside Energy Group
Price$16.35
Change-$0.30 (-1.80%)
Volume$5.36K
Capitalization31.8B
OILCF vs WDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OILCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OILCF vs. WDS commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OILCF is a Hold and WDS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (OILCF: $3.63 vs. WDS: $16.65)
Brand notoriety: OILCF and WDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OILCF: 463% vs. WDS: 108%
Market capitalization -- OILCF: $1.88M vs. WDS: $31.8B
OILCF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.88M. WDS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $31.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OILCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OILCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WDS is a better buy in the long-term than OILCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OILCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OILCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OILCF and WDS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OILCF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

WDS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.70% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WDS($31.8B) has a higher market cap than OILCF($1.88M). OILCF YTD gains are higher at: 44.793 vs. WDS (14.038). WDS has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. OILCF (2.09M). OILCF has less debt than WDS: OILCF (5.76M) vs WDS (11.6B).
OILCFWDSOILCF / WDS
Capitalization1.88M31.8B0%
EBITDA-3.82MN/A-
Gain YTD44.79314.038319%
P/E RatioN/A10.79-
Revenue342KN/A-
Total Cash2.09M1.6B0%
Total Debt5.76M11.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OILCF vs WDS: Fundamental Ratings
OILCF
WDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
9995
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10091
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDS's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as OILCF (44). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to OILCF’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OILCF (100). This means that WDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than OILCF’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as OILCF (99). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to OILCF’s over the last 12 months.

OILCF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as WDS (50). This means that OILCF’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.

WDS's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as OILCF (100). This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to OILCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OILCFWDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OILCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TNON1.180.03
+2.61%
Tenon Medical Inc
ULH25.550.41
+1.63%
Universal Logistics Holdings
MOLN3.580.01
+0.42%
Molecular Partners AG
MGRC125.680.06
+0.05%
McGrath RentCorp
CFG51.71-0.80
-1.52%
Citizens Financial Group

OILCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OILCF and HLEGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OILCF and HLEGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OILCF
1D Price
Change %
OILCF100%
N/A
HLEGF - OILCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWEFF - OILCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDS - OILCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
HEEVF - OILCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CECAF - OILCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDS
1D Price
Change %
WDS100%
-0.48%
VET - WDS
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
FANG - WDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
CNQ - WDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
CHRD - WDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.78%
BTE - WDS
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.54%
More