OHCFF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
8.4M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UPC
Price
$4.39
Change
-$0.14 (-3.09%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.48M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OHCFF vs UPC

Header iconOHCFF vs UPC Comparison
Open Charts OHCFF vs UPCBanner chart's image
LIGHT AI
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization8.4M
Universe Pharmaceuticals
Price$4.39
Change-$0.14 (-3.09%)
Volume$13K
Capitalization2.48M
OHCFF vs UPC Comparison Chart in %
OHCFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UPC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OHCFF vs. UPC commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OHCFF is a Buy and UPC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (OHCFF: $0.06 vs. UPC: $4.39)
Brand notoriety: OHCFF and UPC are both not notable
OHCFF represents the Services to the Health Industry, while UPC is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OHCFF: 3% vs. UPC: 11%
Market capitalization -- OHCFF: $8.4M vs. UPC: $2.48M
OHCFF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $8.4M. UPC’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $2.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $31.35B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $1.49B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $4.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OHCFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUPC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OHCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPC is a better buy in the long-term than OHCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OHCFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OHCFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UPC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UPC is a better buy in the short-term than OHCFF.

Price Growth

OHCFF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +0.93% price change this week, while UPC (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -6.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.47%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-6.16% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+0.90% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OHCFF($8.4M) has a higher market cap than UPC($2.48M). UPC YTD gains are higher at: 15.223 vs. OHCFF (-23.223). UPC has more cash in the bank: 8.86M vs. OHCFF (7.56M).
OHCFFUPCOHCFF / UPC
Capitalization8.4M2.48M339%
EBITDAN/A-15.83M-
Gain YTD-23.22315.223-153%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A26.7M-
Total Cash7.56M8.86M85%
Total DebtN/A6.51M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OHCFF: Fundamental Ratings
OHCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OHCFFUPC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OHCFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UPC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BJDX3.250.06
+1.88%
Bluejay Diagnostics Inc.
GDDY95.711.69
+1.80%
GoDaddy
XBIT2.410.01
+0.42%
XBiotech
SABR1.20-0.05
-3.63%
Sabre Corp
SLNO42.12-1.86
-4.23%
Soleno Therapeutics

OHCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OHCFF and SWDCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OHCFF and SWDCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OHCFF
1D Price
Change %
OHCFF100%
-10.62%
SWDCF - OHCFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYEX - OHCFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKNO - OHCFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.74%
GLASF - OHCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
UPC - OHCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
More

UPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UPC and TXMD have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPC and TXMD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPC
1D Price
Change %
UPC100%
-3.09%
TXMD - UPC
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
BIOA - UPC
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
TKNO - UPC
15%
Poorly correlated
-5.74%
ALVO - UPC
15%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
CRON - UPC
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
More