OHCFF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TKNO
Price
$4.04
Change
-$0.07 (-1.70%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
216.26M
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OHCFF vs TKNO

Header iconOHCFF vs TKNO Comparison
Open Charts OHCFF vs TKNOBanner chart's image
LIGHT AI
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$3.35K
Capitalization11.01M
Alpha Teknova
Price$4.04
Change-$0.07 (-1.70%)
Volume$214.64K
Capitalization216.26M
OHCFF vs TKNO Comparison Chart in %
OHCFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TKNO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OHCFF vs. TKNO commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OHCFF is a Hold and TKNO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (OHCFF: $0.09 vs. TKNO: $4.04)
Brand notoriety: OHCFF and TKNO are both not notable
OHCFF represents the Services to the Health Industry, while TKNO is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OHCFF: 5% vs. TKNO: 132%
Market capitalization -- OHCFF: $11.01M vs. TKNO: $216.26M
OHCFF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $11.01M. TKNO’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $216.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $38.09B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.15B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OHCFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTKNO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OHCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TKNO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OHCFF and TKNO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OHCFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TKNO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OHCFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TKNO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TKNO is a better buy in the short-term than OHCFF.

Price Growth

OHCFF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -5.20% price change this week, while TKNO (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -13.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.77%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

TKNO is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-0.83% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-0.01% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TKNO($216M) has a higher market cap than OHCFF($11M). OHCFF YTD gains are higher at: -47.333 vs. TKNO (-51.617). TKNO has more cash in the bank: 22.1M vs. OHCFF (7.56M).
OHCFFTKNOOHCFF / TKNO
Capitalization11M216M5%
EBITDAN/A-11.1M-
Gain YTD-47.333-51.61792%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A39.8M-
Total Cash7.56M22.1M34%
Total DebtN/A29M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OHCFF: Fundamental Ratings
OHCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OHCFFTKNO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OHCFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TKNO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APRAF0.190.01
+5.71%
Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.
FANUF37.170.23
+0.61%
Fanuc Corporation
GGDVY44.20N/A
N/A
Guangdong Investment Ltd.
ELRNF1.55N/A
N/A
Elron Ventures Ltd.
BWERY20.00N/A
N/A
BW Energy Limited

OHCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OHCFF and SWDCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OHCFF and SWDCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OHCFF
1D Price
Change %
OHCFF100%
+11.92%
SWDCF - OHCFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYEX - OHCFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKNO - OHCFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
GLASF - OHCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
UPC - OHCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
+31.16%
More

TKNO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TKNO has been loosely correlated with AMRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TKNO jumps, then AMRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKNO
1D Price
Change %
TKNO100%
-1.70%
AMRX - TKNO
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
BIOA - TKNO
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
HROW - TKNO
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
VTRS - TKNO
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
SIGA - TKNO
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More