Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OFSFX vs WCMFX
OFSFX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts OFSFX vs WCMFX
Olstein Strategic Opportunities Adviser
Price$22.42
Change+$0.32 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.2M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.59
Change+$0.04 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65M
OFSFX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OFSFX vs. WCMFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OFSFX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OFSFX has more cash in the bank: 47.2M vs. WCMFX (2.65M). OFSFX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: OFSFX (0.60) vs WCMFX (0.00). OFSFX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: OFSFX (11 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). OFSFX (1.52) and WCMFX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . OFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). OFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: OFSFX (1000) vs WCMFX (100000). OFSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.08 vs. WCMFX (-76.13). OFSFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.40 vs. WCMFX (-64.64).
| OFSFX | WCMFX | OFSFX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.45 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.889 | -70.451 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.2M | 2.65M | 1,784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.08 | -76.13 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.14 | -66.82 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.40 | -64.64 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement