OFS
Price
$8.48
Change
+$0.01 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
133.04M
4 days until earnings call
WNDLF
Price
$97.73
Change
-$0.47 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OFS vs WNDLF

Header iconOFS vs WNDLF Comparison
Open Charts OFS vs WNDLFBanner chart's image
OFS Capital
Price$8.48
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
Volume$31.27K
Capitalization133.04M
Wendel
Price$97.73
Change-$0.47 (-0.48%)
Volume$61
Capitalization4.3B
OFS vs WNDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OFS vs. WNDLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OFS is a StrongBuy and WNDLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (OFS: $8.48 vs. WNDLF: $97.73)
Brand notoriety: OFS and WNDLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OFS: 61% vs. WNDLF: 98%
Market capitalization -- OFS: $133.04M vs. WNDLF: $4.3B
OFS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $133.04M. WNDLF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWNDLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WNDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OFS is a better buy in the long-term than WNDLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WNDLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WNDLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OFS and WNDLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OFS (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WNDLF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

OFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WNDLF($4.3B) has a higher market cap than OFS($133M). OFS has higher P/E ratio than WNDLF: OFS (23.43) vs WNDLF (15.67). OFS YTD gains are higher at: 13.167 vs. WNDLF (2.192). WNDLF has more cash in the bank: 3.36B vs. OFS (15.9M). OFS has less debt than WNDLF: OFS (300M) vs WNDLF (6.24B). WNDLF has higher revenues than OFS: WNDLF (8.91B) vs OFS (4.79M).
OFSWNDLFOFS / WNDLF
Capitalization133M4.3B3%
EBITDAN/A1.7B-
Gain YTD13.1672.192601%
P/E Ratio23.4315.67150%
Revenue4.79M8.91B0%
Total Cash15.9M3.36B0%
Total Debt300M6.24B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OFS vs WNDLF: Fundamental Ratings
OFS
WNDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2493
SMR RATING
1..100
3995
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
509

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OFS's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as WNDLF (16). This means that OFS’s stock grew similarly to WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

OFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WNDLF (93). This means that OFS’s stock grew significantly faster than WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

OFS's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WNDLF (95). This means that OFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

OFS's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as WNDLF (57). This means that OFS’s stock grew similarly to WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

OFS's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WNDLF (98). This means that OFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than WNDLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OFSWNDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPXHF13.50N/A
N/A
Inpex Corp.
MEPDF15.90N/A
N/A
Medipal Holdings Corp.
SHLLF0.93N/A
N/A
Shelf Drilling Ltd.
TGMR0.24N/A
N/A
Troy Gold & Mineral Corp.
CNADF0.06N/A
N/A
CANADABIS CAP INC

OFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OFS has been loosely correlated with PFLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OFS jumps, then PFLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OFS
1D Price
Change %
OFS100%
+0.12%
PFLT - OFS
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FSK - OFS
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
CSWC - OFS
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
CGBD - OFS
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
HTGC - OFS
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More

WNDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WNDLF and OFS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WNDLF and OFS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WNDLF
1D Price
Change %
WNDLF100%
N/A
OFS - WNDLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
FFXDF - WNDLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
URNAF - WNDLF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNMLA - WNDLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCMG - WNDLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
More