Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OFAFX vs RMEBX
OFAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts OFAFX vs RMEBX
Olstein All Cap Value Adv
Price$27.84
Change+$0.39 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets484.06M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.96
Change+$0.19 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.11B
OFAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OFAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OFAFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. OFAFX (484M). RMEBX (1.05) and OFAFX (1.00) have matching dividends . OFAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: OFAFX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). OFAFX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). OFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OFAFX: RMEBX (250) vs OFAFX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. OFAFX (-7.73). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 56.67 vs. OFAFX (14.48).
| OFAFX | RMEBX | OFAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.197 | 13.729 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 484M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.73 | 4.89 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.45 | 42.55 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.48 | 56.67 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.03 | 89.37 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement