Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ODDS vs SMH
ODDS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts ODDS vs SMH
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
Price$29.32
Change-$0.08 (-0.27%)
Volume$144
Net Assets4.76M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$345.77
Change+$0.95 (+0.28%)
Volume$7.49K
Net Assets37.62B
ODDS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ODDS vs. SMH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ODDS is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. ODDS (4.76M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than ODDS: SMH (42.388) vs ODDS (18.240). ODDS was incepted earlier than SMH: ODDS (4 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than ODDS (0.62). ODDS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| ODDS | SMH | ODDS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 18.240 | 42.388 | 43% |
| Net Assets | 4.76M | 37.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.35 | 177% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 15.00 | 327% |
| Yield | 2.50 | 0.30 | 846% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ODDS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 18 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ODDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ODDS has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ODDS jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ODDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODDS | 100% | -2.76% | ||
| BILI - ODDS | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.78% | ||
| LNW - ODDS | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NVDA - ODDS | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| NXDR - ODDS | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| RBLX - ODDS | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.94% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -3.01% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -5.02% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -3.25% | ||
More | ||||