OCSL
Price
$14.46
Change
+$0.13 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.55B
9 days until earnings call
SLMBP
Price
$76.00
Change
+$0.09 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCSL vs SLMBP

Header iconOCSL vs SLMBP Comparison
Open Charts OCSL vs SLMBPBanner chart's image
Oaktree Specialty Lending
Price$14.46
Change+$0.13 (+0.91%)
Volume$391.99K
Capitalization1.55B
SLM
Price$76.00
Change+$0.09 (+0.12%)
Volume$4.49K
CapitalizationN/A
OCSL vs SLMBP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCSL vs. SLMBP commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCSL is a StrongBuy and SLMBP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (OCSL: $14.46 vs. SLMBP: $76.00)
Brand notoriety: OCSL and SLMBP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCSL: 67% vs. SLMBP: 50%
Market capitalization -- OCSL: $1.55B vs. SLMBP: $0
OCSL [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.55B. SLMBP’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCSL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLMBP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OCSL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLMBP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCSL is a better buy in the long-term than SLMBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCSL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLMBP’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCSL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLMBP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLMBP is a better buy in the short-term than OCSL.

Price Growth

OCSL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +1.40% price change this week, while SLMBP (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

OCSL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.70% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMBP YTD gains are higher at: 7.043 vs. OCSL (0.485). OCSL has less debt than SLMBP: OCSL (1.62B) vs SLMBP (5.23B). SLMBP has higher revenues than OCSL: SLMBP (1.81B) vs OCSL (122M).
OCSLSLMBPOCSL / SLMBP
Capitalization1.55BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.4857.0437%
P/E Ratio12.46N/A-
Revenue122M1.81B7%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.62B5.23B31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCSL vs SLMBP: Fundamental Ratings
OCSL
SLMBP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
352
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
344
SMR RATING
1..100
21100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCSL's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SLMBP (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that OCSL’s stock grew similarly to SLMBP’s over the last 12 months.

SLMBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OCSL (34) in the null industry. This means that SLMBP’s stock grew similarly to OCSL’s over the last 12 months.

OCSL's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLMBP (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that OCSL’s stock grew significantly faster than SLMBP’s over the last 12 months.

SLMBP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OCSL (56) in the null industry. This means that SLMBP’s stock grew similarly to OCSL’s over the last 12 months.

OCSL's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLMBP (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that OCSL’s stock grew significantly faster than SLMBP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCSLSLMBP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGHYX41.360.23
+0.56%
Hartford Healthcare Y
IJMAX15.850.07
+0.44%
VY® JPMorgan Mid Cap Value A
MTCAX66.580.25
+0.38%
MFS Technology A
STPAX22.960.02
+0.09%
Saratoga Technology & Comm A
FPCSX43.98-0.08
-0.18%
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional

OCSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCSL has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCSL jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCSL
1D Price
Change %
OCSL100%
+0.91%
OBDC - OCSL
71%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
RWAY - OCSL
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OMF - OCSL
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
AL - OCSL
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
RM - OCSL
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More

SLMBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLMBP has been loosely correlated with FTAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLMBP jumps, then FTAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLMBP
1D Price
Change %
SLMBP100%
+0.12%
FTAIN - SLMBP
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
OBDC - SLMBP
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
FTAIM - SLMBP
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
RWAY - SLMBP
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OCSL - SLMBP
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
More