OCSL
Price
$16.04
Change
+$0.06 (+0.38%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
4 days until earnings call
RWAY
Price
$10.40
Change
-$0.08 (-0.76%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
104 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OCSL vs RWAY

Header iconOCSL vs RWAY Comparison
Open Charts OCSL vs RWAYBanner chart's image
Oaktree Specialty Lending
Price$16.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
Volume$418.15K
CapitalizationN/A
Runway Growth Finance
Price$10.40
Change-$0.08 (-0.76%)
Volume$278.63K
CapitalizationN/A
OCSL vs RWAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
OCSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCSL vs. RWAY commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCSL is a StrongBuy and RWAY is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (OCSL: $16.04 vs. RWAY: $10.40)
Brand notoriety: OCSL and RWAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCSL: 67% vs. RWAY: 103%
Market capitalization -- OCSL: $1.55B vs. RWAY: $493.2M
OCSL [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.55B. RWAY’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $493.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCSL’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRWAY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OCSL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • RWAY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCSL is a better buy in the long-term than RWAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RWAY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RWAY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RWAY is a better buy in the short-term than OCSL.

Price Growth

OCSL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +0.56% price change this week, while RWAY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

OCSL is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

RWAY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.36% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCSL($1.55B) has a higher market cap than RWAY($493M). OCSL has higher P/E ratio than RWAY: OCSL (12.46) vs RWAY (11.17). RWAY YTD gains are higher at: -7.246 vs. OCSL (-13.982). RWAY has less debt than OCSL: RWAY (510M) vs OCSL (1.62B). OCSL has higher revenues than RWAY: OCSL (122M) vs RWAY (55.9M).
OCSLRWAYOCSL / RWAY
Capitalization1.55B493M315%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.982-7.246193%
P/E Ratio12.4611.17112%
Revenue122M55.9M218%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.62B510M318%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCSL: Fundamental Ratings
OCSL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCSLRWAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OCSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

OCSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCSL has been loosely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCSL jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCSL
1D Price
Change %
OCSL100%
+0.38%
OBDC - OCSL
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
NAVI - OCSL
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
LC - OCSL
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
SLM - OCSL
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
AL - OCSL
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
More

RWAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RWAY and CTOS have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RWAY and CTOS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RWAY
1D Price
Change %
RWAY100%
-0.76%
CTOS - RWAY
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
OCSL - RWAY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
HRI - RWAY
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
URI - RWAY
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
OBDC - RWAY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
More