OCPNF
Price
$13.03
Change
-$0.20 (-1.51%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
20.63B
PLLWF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
56.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCPNF vs PLLWF

Header iconOCPNF vs PLLWF Comparison
Open Charts OCPNF vs PLLWFBanner chart's image
Olympus
Price$13.03
Change-$0.20 (-1.51%)
Volume$50.29K
Capitalization20.63B
Polarean Imaging
Price$0.01
Change-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization56.36M
OCPNF vs PLLWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLLWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCPNF vs. PLLWF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCPNF is a Hold and PLLWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (OCPNF: $13.03 vs. PLLWF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: OCPNF and PLLWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCPNF: 965% vs. PLLWF: 100%
Market capitalization -- OCPNF: $20.63B vs. PLLWF: $56.36M
OCPNF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $20.63B. PLLWF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $56.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCPNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLLWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OCPNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCPNF is a better buy in the long-term than PLLWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCPNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLLWF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCPNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLLWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLLWF is a better buy in the short-term than OCPNF.

Price Growth

OCPNF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -1.51% price change this week, while PLLWF (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+2.51% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCPNF($20.6B) has a higher market cap than PLLWF($56.4M). OCPNF YTD gains are higher at: -15.935 vs. PLLWF (-26.667). OCPNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 257B vs. PLLWF (-15.14M). OCPNF has more cash in the bank: 181B vs. PLLWF (22.7M). PLLWF has less debt than OCPNF: PLLWF (430K) vs OCPNF (340B). OCPNF has higher revenues than PLLWF: OCPNF (882B) vs PLLWF (1.4M).
OCPNFPLLWFOCPNF / PLLWF
Capitalization20.6B56.4M36,525%
EBITDA257B-15.14M-1,697,800%
Gain YTD-15.935-26.66760%
P/E Ratio20.41N/A-
Revenue882B1.4M63,090,129%
Total Cash181B22.7M797,357%
Total Debt340B430K79,069,767%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCPNF vs PLLWF: Fundamental Ratings
OCPNF
PLLWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6597
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6190
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCPNF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (30). This means that OCPNF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

OCPNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (100). This means that OCPNF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

OCPNF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (97). This means that OCPNF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

OCPNF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (90). This means that OCPNF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

OCPNF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (100). This means that OCPNF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCPNFPLLWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLLWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EQ0.34N/A
N/A
Equillium
BAH102.86-0.41
-0.40%
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp
FBP20.88-0.18
-0.85%
First BanCorp
IMTX5.43-0.16
-2.86%
Immatics NV
GWH1.21-0.09
-6.92%
ESS Tech

OCPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCPNF has been loosely correlated with OLYMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCPNF jumps, then OLYMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCPNF
1D Price
Change %
OCPNF100%
N/A
OLYMY - OCPNF
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
NMTC - OCPNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.85%
APDN - OCPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.98%
TRUMF - OCPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
PFGTF - OCPNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLLWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLLWF and RYLPF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLLWF and RYLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLLWF
1D Price
Change %
PLLWF100%
N/A
RYLPF - PLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
RSCF - PLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVYTF - PLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OCPNF - PLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCHM - PLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More