OCLCF
Price
$123.32
Change
+$29.83 (+31.91%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.08B
PMCUF
Price
$179.69
Change
+$4.02 (+2.29%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCLCF vs PMCUF

Header iconOCLCF vs PMCUF Comparison
Open Charts OCLCF vs PMCUFBanner chart's image
Oracle
Price$123.32
Change+$29.83 (+31.91%)
Volume$900
Capitalization9.08B
Pro Medicus
Price$179.69
Change+$4.02 (+2.29%)
Volume$201
Capitalization4.8B
OCLCF vs PMCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCLCF vs. PMCUF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCLCF is a Hold and PMCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (OCLCF: $123.32 vs. PMCUF: $179.69)
Brand notoriety: OCLCF and PMCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCLCF: 767% vs. PMCUF: 78%
Market capitalization -- OCLCF: $9.08B vs. PMCUF: $4.8B
OCLCF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $9.08B. PMCUF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCLCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OCLCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OCLCF and PMCUF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCLCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCLCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PMCUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCLCF is a better buy in the short-term than PMCUF.

Price Growth

OCLCF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +31.91% price change this week, while PMCUF (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCLCF($9.08B) has a higher market cap than PMCUF($4.8B). PMCUF has higher P/E ratio than OCLCF: PMCUF (140.85) vs OCLCF (26.04). OCLCF YTD gains are higher at: 35.160 vs. PMCUF (15.727). OCLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74.3B vs. PMCUF (78.6M). OCLCF has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. PMCUF (90.6M). OCLCF has higher revenues than PMCUF: OCLCF (224B) vs PMCUF (106M).
OCLCFPMCUFOCLCF / PMCUF
Capitalization9.08B4.8B189%
EBITDA74.3B78.6M94,529%
Gain YTD35.16015.727224%
P/E Ratio26.04140.8518%
Revenue224B106M211,321%
Total Cash62.3B90.6M68,764%
Total DebtN/A2.28M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCLCF vs PMCUF: Fundamental Ratings
OCLCF
PMCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7320
SMR RATING
1..100
1218
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1618
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCLCF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMCUF (95). This means that OCLCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCLCF (73). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCLCF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLCF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (18). This means that OCLCF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLCF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (39). This means that OCLCF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

OCLCF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (18). This means that OCLCF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCLCFPMCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDN38.630.07
+0.18%
Invesco RAFI Developed Mkts ex-US S-METF
HEAL10.730.02
+0.17%
Global X HealthTech ETF
FIW107.960.11
+0.11%
First Trust Water ETF
INMU23.43N/A
N/A
iShares Intermediate Muni Income Act ETF
RBLD70.18N/A
N/A
First Trust Alerian US NextGen InfrasETF

OCLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCLCF has been loosely correlated with XPER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCLCF jumps, then XPER could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCLCF
1D Price
Change %
OCLCF100%
+31.91%
XPER - OCLCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
CMPD - OCLCF
33%
Loosely correlated
+13.42%
PMCUF - OCLCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
HUBC - OCLCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.18%
CLBT - OCLCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMCUF has been loosely correlated with BMBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMCUF jumps, then BMBL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCUF
1D Price
Change %
PMCUF100%
+2.29%
BMBL - PMCUF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
OCLCF - PMCUF
31%
Poorly correlated
+31.91%
TMSNY - PMCUF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
DAVA - PMCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIVN - PMCUF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More