OCINF
Price
$8.79
Change
+$0.03 (+0.34%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6B
SGLFF
Price
$4.15
Change
+$0.01 (+0.24%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCINF vs SGLFF

Header iconOCINF vs SGLFF Comparison
Open Charts OCINF vs SGLFFBanner chart's image
OCI
Price$8.79
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
Volume$200
Capitalization6B
Sgl Group
Price$4.15
Change+$0.01 (+0.24%)
Volume$400
Capitalization1.02B
OCINF vs SGLFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCINF vs. SGLFF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCINF is a StrongBuy and SGLFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (OCINF: $8.79 vs. SGLFF: $4.15)
Brand notoriety: OCINF and SGLFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCINF: 6% vs. SGLFF: 108%
Market capitalization -- OCINF: $6B vs. SGLFF: $1.02B
OCINF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $6B. SGLFF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $1.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCINF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OCINF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SGLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCINF is a better buy in the long-term than SGLFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCINF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGLFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCINF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SGLFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGLFF is a better buy in the short-term than OCINF.

Price Growth

OCINF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.39% price change this week, while SGLFF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.16% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCINF($6B) has a higher market cap than SGLFF($1.02B). SGLFF has higher P/E ratio than OCINF: SGLFF (8.42) vs OCINF (7.42). OCINF YTD gains are higher at: 30.022 vs. SGLFF (2.723). OCINF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.87B vs. SGLFF (183M). OCINF has more cash in the bank: 2.46B vs. SGLFF (189M). SGLFF has less debt than OCINF: SGLFF (344M) vs OCINF (3.82B). OCINF has higher revenues than SGLFF: OCINF (8.76B) vs SGLFF (1.15B).
OCINFSGLFFOCINF / SGLFF
Capitalization6B1.02B586%
EBITDA2.87B183M1,568%
Gain YTD30.0222.7231,103%
P/E Ratio7.428.4288%
Revenue8.76B1.15B762%
Total Cash2.46B189M1,302%
Total Debt3.82B344M1,109%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCINF vs SGLFF: Fundamental Ratings
OCINF
SGLFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8492
SMR RATING
1..100
1093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5597
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCINF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGLFF (99). This means that OCINF’s stock grew significantly faster than SGLFF’s over the last 12 months.

OCINF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLFF (92). This means that OCINF’s stock grew similarly to SGLFF’s over the last 12 months.

OCINF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGLFF (93). This means that OCINF’s stock grew significantly faster than SGLFF’s over the last 12 months.

OCINF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLFF (62). This means that OCINF’s stock grew similarly to SGLFF’s over the last 12 months.

OCINF's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGLFF (97). This means that OCINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGLFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCINFSGLFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FYC81.190.21
+0.25%
First Trust Small Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
IOCT33.220.01
+0.03%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF™ - Oct
XT67.39N/A
N/A
iShares Exponential Technologies ETF
VNMHF4.02N/A
N/A
Vietnam Holdings, Ltd.
AMAX7.99-0.01
-0.14%
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF

OCINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCINF and DLNDY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCINF and DLNDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCINF
1D Price
Change %
OCINF100%
+0.39%
DLNDY - OCINF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKCBF - OCINF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NNXPF - OCINF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
SHECY - OCINF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
NVZMF - OCINF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
More

SGLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGLFF has been loosely correlated with CUYRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGLFF jumps, then CUYRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLFF
1D Price
Change %
SGLFF100%
N/A
CUYRF - SGLFF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ICPVF - SGLFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHECY - SGLFF
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
OCINF - SGLFF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
SHECF - SGLFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.17%
More