OCGSF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.02 (+9.52%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
32.09M
YGTFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
18.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCGSF vs YGTFF

Header iconOCGSF vs YGTFF Comparison
Open Charts OCGSF vs YGTFFBanner chart's image
Outcrop SILVER & GOLD
Price$0.23
Change+$0.02 (+9.52%)
Volume$860.08K
Capitalization32.09M
GOLD TERRA RESOURCE
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$280.6K
Capitalization18.03M
OCGSF vs YGTFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YGTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCGSF vs. YGTFF commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCGSF is a Hold and YGTFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (OCGSF: $0.23 vs. YGTFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: OCGSF and YGTFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCGSF: 152% vs. YGTFF: 209%
Market capitalization -- OCGSF: $32.09M vs. YGTFF: $18.03M
OCGSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $32.09M. YGTFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCGSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYGTFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OCGSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YGTFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, YGTFF is a better buy in the long-term than OCGSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCGSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YGTFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCGSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YGTFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCGSF is a better buy in the short-term than YGTFF.

Price Growth

OCGSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.04% price change this week, while YGTFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.58% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCGSF($32.1M) has a higher market cap than YGTFF($18M). OCGSF YTD gains are higher at: 73.454 vs. YGTFF (6.061). YGTFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.24M vs. OCGSF (-10.39M). OCGSF has more cash in the bank: 4.98M vs. YGTFF (1.07M). YGTFF has less debt than OCGSF: YGTFF (0) vs OCGSF (19.1K). OCGSF (0) and YGTFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
OCGSFYGTFFOCGSF / YGTFF
Capitalization32.1M18M178%
EBITDA-10.39M-2.24M465%
Gain YTD73.4546.0611,212%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.98M1.07M466%
Total Debt19.1K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCGSF vs YGTFF: Fundamental Ratings
OCGSF
YGTFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1670
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7577
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YGTFF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as OCGSF (55). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew similarly to OCGSF’s over the last 12 months.

YGTFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OCGSF (100). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew similarly to OCGSF’s over the last 12 months.

YGTFF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as OCGSF (98). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew similarly to OCGSF’s over the last 12 months.

OCGSF's Price Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as YGTFF (77). This means that OCGSF’s stock grew similarly to YGTFF’s over the last 12 months.

OCGSF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as YGTFF (100). This means that OCGSF’s stock grew similarly to YGTFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCGSFYGTFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YGTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GPPRF0.400.01
+3.16%
Cerro De Pasco Res Inc.
AFLYY1.34N/A
+0.37%
Air France-KLM
YZCHF1.00N/A
N/A
YANKUANG ENERGY GROUP CO LTD.
MNLCF15.22N/A
N/A
Manulife Financial Corp.
ORENF4.50N/A
N/A
Origin Enterprises PLC

OCGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCGSF has been loosely correlated with ISVLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCGSF jumps, then ISVLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCGSF
1D Price
Change %
OCGSF100%
+8.90%
ISVLF - OCGSF
49%
Loosely correlated
+5.83%
TORXF - OCGSF
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
LGDTF - OCGSF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.55%
AYASF - OCGSF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
GSVRF - OCGSF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More

YGTFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YGTFF and CBGZF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YGTFF and CBGZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YGTFF
1D Price
Change %
YGTFF100%
+8.25%
CBGZF - YGTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+11.96%
MAIFF - YGTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+21.09%
OCGSF - YGTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.90%
SSRM - YGTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
ZIJMF - YGTFF
14%
Poorly correlated
+4.71%
More