OCGSF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
RDGMF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

OCGSF vs RDGMF

Header iconOCGSF vs RDGMF Comparison
Open Charts OCGSF vs RDGMFBanner chart's image
Outcrop Gold & Silver
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$275.49K
CapitalizationN/A
RIDGELINE MINERALS
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$129.97K
CapitalizationN/A
OCGSF vs RDGMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCGSF vs. RDGMF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCGSF is a Hold and RDGMF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (OCGSF: $0.17 vs. RDGMF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: OCGSF and RDGMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCGSF: 71% vs. RDGMF: 131%
Market capitalization -- OCGSF: $32.09M vs. RDGMF: $14.09M
OCGSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $32.09M. RDGMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $14.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCGSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDGMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OCGSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RDGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RDGMF is a better buy in the long-term than OCGSF.

Price Growth

OCGSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.11% price change this week, while RDGMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -15.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCGSF($32.1M) has a higher market cap than RDGMF($14.1M). RDGMF YTD gains are higher at: 19.020 vs. OCGSF (15.314). RDGMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -941.15K vs. OCGSF (-10.39M). OCGSF has more cash in the bank: 4.98M vs. RDGMF (416K). OCGSF has less debt than RDGMF: OCGSF (19.1K) vs RDGMF (74.7K). OCGSF (0) and RDGMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
OCGSFRDGMFOCGSF / RDGMF
Capitalization32.1M14.1M228%
EBITDA-10.39M-941.15K1,104%
Gain YTD15.31419.02081%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.98M416K1,196%
Total Debt19.1K74.7K26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCGSF: Fundamental Ratings
OCGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

OCGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCGSF has been loosely correlated with ISVLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCGSF jumps, then ISVLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCGSF
1D Price
Change %
OCGSF100%
+11.27%
ISVLF - OCGSF
49%
Loosely correlated
+6.89%
TORXF - OCGSF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
DOLLF - OCGSF
44%
Loosely correlated
+7.41%
LGDTF - OCGSF
42%
Loosely correlated
+7.71%
AYASF - OCGSF
39%
Loosely correlated
-21.50%
More

RDGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDGMF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDGMF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDGMF
1D Price
Change %
RDGMF100%
-7.44%
TORXF - RDGMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
ISVLF - RDGMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+6.89%
WEXPF - RDGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
RIOFF - RDGMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
OCGSF - RDGMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+11.27%
More