OCGPF
Price
$2.65
Change
-$0.45 (-14.52%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
480.5M
RRSFF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
Capitalization
287.02K
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCGPF vs RRSFF

Header iconOCGPF vs RRSFF Comparison
Open Charts OCGPF vs RRSFFBanner chart's image
Oceana Group
Price$2.65
Change-$0.45 (-14.52%)
Volume$125
Capitalization480.5M
Aretto Wellness
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization287.02K
OCGPF vs RRSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCGPF vs. RRSFF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCGPF is a Hold and RRSFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (OCGPF: $2.65 vs. RRSFF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: OCGPF and RRSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCGPF: 80% vs. RRSFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- OCGPF: $480.5M vs. RRSFF: $287.02K
OCGPF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $480.5M. RRSFF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $287.02K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCGPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRRSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OCGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RRSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCGPF is a better buy in the long-term than RRSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCGPF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OCGPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

OCGPF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RRSFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCGPF($480M) has a higher market cap than RRSFF($287K). RRSFF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. OCGPF (-24.286). OCGPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.57B vs. RRSFF (-1.57M). OCGPF has more cash in the bank: 728M vs. RRSFF (52.9K). RRSFF has less debt than OCGPF: RRSFF (70K) vs OCGPF (3.84B). OCGPF has higher revenues than RRSFF: OCGPF (9.6B) vs RRSFF (-88.4K).
OCGPFRRSFFOCGPF / RRSFF
Capitalization480M287K167,247%
EBITDA1.57B-1.57M-99,853%
Gain YTD-24.2860.000-
P/E Ratio14.35N/A-
Revenue9.6B-88.4K-10,862,114%
Total Cash728M52.9K1,376,181%
Total Debt3.84B70K5,484,286%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCGPF: Fundamental Ratings
OCGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCGPFRRSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEDSX31.790.22
+0.70%
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
HWAAX39.990.27
+0.68%
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps A
CSFZX54.770.03
+0.05%
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
SOCUX21.36N/A
N/A
Spirit of America Utilities C
FEGKX15.08N/A
N/A
Fidelity Equity Growth K6

OCGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCGPF and NSLYF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCGPF and NSLYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCGPF
1D Price
Change %
OCGPF100%
N/A
NSLYF - OCGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRSFF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDSYA - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOSCF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAAF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RRSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RRSFF and SHGXY have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RRSFF and SHGXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRSFF
1D Price
Change %
RRSFF100%
N/A
SHGXY - RRSFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YMZBY - RRSFF
1%
Poorly correlated
+17.84%
JWLLF - RRSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUFBY - RRSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OCGPF - RRSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More