OCGPF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
378.28M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RRSFF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
132.62K
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCGPF vs RRSFF

Header iconOCGPF vs RRSFF Comparison
Open Charts OCGPF vs RRSFFBanner chart's image
Oceana Group
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization378.28M
Aretto Wellness
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization132.62K
OCGPF vs RRSFF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCGPF vs. RRSFF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCGPF is a Hold and RRSFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (OCGPF: $2.57 vs. RRSFF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: OCGPF and RRSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCGPF: 62% vs. RRSFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- OCGPF: $378.28M vs. RRSFF: $132.62K
OCGPF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $378.28M. RRSFF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $132.62K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $261.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCGPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRRSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OCGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RRSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCGPF is a better buy in the long-term than RRSFF.

Price Growth

OCGPF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RRSFF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.95% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCGPF($378M) has a higher market cap than RRSFF($133K). RRSFF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. OCGPF (-26.629).
OCGPFRRSFFOCGPF / RRSFF
Capitalization378M133K284,211%
EBITDA1.34BN/A-
Gain YTD-26.6290.000-
P/E Ratio6.73N/A-
Revenue10.2BN/A-
Total Cash830MN/A-
Total Debt4.49BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCGPF: Fundamental Ratings
OCGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCGPFRRSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRZIX13.920.07
+0.51%
BlackRock Sust Aware Adg Intl Eq Ins
QTENX13.690.03
+0.22%
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II N
FSWCX13.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI US Value Index
FIKJX17.12N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Z
MSAZX32.12-0.06
-0.19%
Invesco Main Street All Cap R5

OCGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCGPF and PRBZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCGPF and PRBZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCGPF
1D Price
Change %
OCGPF100%
N/A
PRBZF - OCGPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
TUFBY - OCGPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - OCGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMG - OCGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
RRSFF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RRSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RRSFF and SHGXY have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RRSFF and SHGXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRSFF
1D Price
Change %
RRSFF100%
N/A
SHGXY - RRSFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JWLLF - RRSFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YMZBY - RRSFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUFBY - RRSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OCGPF - RRSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More