OCGPF
Price
$3.00
Change
+$0.43 (+16.73%)
Updated
Dec 30 closing price
Capitalization
415.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRBZF
Price
$72.52
Change
-$0.50 (-0.68%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCGPF vs PRBZF

Header iconOCGPF vs PRBZF Comparison
Open Charts OCGPF vs PRBZFBanner chart's image
Oceana Group
Price$3.00
Change+$0.43 (+16.73%)
Volume$500
Capitalization415.75M
Premium Brands Holding
Price$72.52
Change-$0.50 (-0.68%)
Volume$16.51K
Capitalization3.2B
OCGPF vs PRBZF Comparison Chart in %
OCGPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRBZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCGPF vs. PRBZF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCGPF is a Hold and PRBZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (OCGPF: $3.00 vs. PRBZF: $72.52)
Brand notoriety: OCGPF and PRBZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCGPF: 57% vs. PRBZF: 148%
Market capitalization -- OCGPF: $415.75M vs. PRBZF: $3.2B
OCGPF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $415.75M. PRBZF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $245.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCGPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePRBZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OCGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PRBZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OCGPF and PRBZF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCGPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRBZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCGPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PRBZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCGPF is a better buy in the short-term than PRBZF.

Price Growth

OCGPF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PRBZF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +113.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.47% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRBZF($3.2B) has a higher market cap than OCGPF($416M). PRBZF has higher P/E ratio than OCGPF: PRBZF (68.52) vs OCGPF (8.77). OCGPF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. PRBZF (-2.168). OCGPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.62B vs. PRBZF (519M). OCGPF has more cash in the bank: 603M vs. PRBZF (28.6M). OCGPF (3.36B) and PRBZF (3.39B) have identical debt. OCGPF has higher revenues than PRBZF: OCGPF (10B) vs PRBZF (7.22B).
OCGPFPRBZFOCGPF / PRBZF
Capitalization416M3.2B13%
EBITDA1.62B519M313%
Gain YTD0.000-2.168-
P/E Ratio8.7768.5213%
Revenue10B7.22B138%
Total Cash603M28.6M2,108%
Total Debt3.36B3.39B99%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCGPF vs PRBZF: Fundamental Ratings
OCGPF
PRBZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4383
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9686
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3019

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCGPF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as PRBZF (29). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PRBZF (100). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as OCGPF (96). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to OCGPF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as OCGPF (48). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to OCGPF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as OCGPF (29). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to OCGPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCGPFPRBZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
23%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCGPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRBZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MINGX44.330.08
+0.18%
MFS International Intrinsic Value R3
ABPAX12.81N/A
N/A
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port A
BINIX33.74N/A
N/A
Baron International Growth Institutional
JORNX20.06-0.04
-0.20%
Janus Henderson Global Select T
BIRKX23.84-0.17
-0.71%
BlackRock Sust Awr Advtg Lg Cp Cr K

OCGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCGPF and PRBZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCGPF and PRBZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCGPF
1D Price
Change %
OCGPF100%
N/A
PRBZF - OCGPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
TUFBY - OCGPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - OCGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMG - OCGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
RRSFF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PRBZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRBZF and OCGPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRBZF and OCGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRBZF
1D Price
Change %
PRBZF100%
-0.68%
OCGPF - PRBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRPT - PRBZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
SAPIF - PRBZF
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
RSGUF - PRBZF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLJF - PRBZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More