Advertisement
OCFT vs RMNI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCFT is a Hold and RMNI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OCFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMNI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- OCFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RMNI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RMNI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- RMNI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
OCFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RMNI (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
RMNI is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.14% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| OCFT | RMNI | OCFT / RMNI | |
| Capitalization | 308M | 359M | 86% |
| EBITDA | -241.38M | 80.2M | -301% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.773 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 0.04 | 8.32 | 1% |
| Revenue | 1.63B | 426M | 383% |
| Total Cash | 1.47B | 109M | 1,347% |
| Total Debt | 20.7M | 91.9M | 23% |
OCFT | RMNI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OCFT's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RMNI (41) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OCFT’s stock grew similarly to RMNI’s over the last 12 months.
OCFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMNI (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OCFT’s stock grew similarly to RMNI’s over the last 12 months.
RMNI's SMR Rating (90) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as OCFT (96) in the null industry. This means that RMNI’s stock grew similarly to OCFT’s over the last 12 months.
OCFT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as RMNI (60) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OCFT’s stock grew similarly to RMNI’s over the last 12 months.
RMNI's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCFT (95) in the null industry. This means that RMNI’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCFT’s over the last 12 months.
| OCFT | RMNI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
OCFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OCFT and CLSK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCFT and CLSK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OCFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCFT | 100% | N/A | ||
| CLSK - OCFT | 28% Poorly correlated | +6.29% | ||
| RMNI - OCFT | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
| NRDY - OCFT | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DTSS - OCFT | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| SANG - OCFT | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RMNI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMNI has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMNI jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMNI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMNI | 100% | -1.51% | ||
| CLSK - RMNI | 36% Loosely correlated | +6.29% | ||
| RIOT - RMNI | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| COIN - RMNI | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| BB - RMNI | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| MTLS - RMNI | 33% Poorly correlated | -4.54% | ||
More | ||||