OC
Price
$182.60
Change
+$3.32 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.51B
26 days until earnings call
TT
Price
$389.23
Change
+$0.37 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.38B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OC vs TT

Header iconOC vs TT Comparison
Open Charts OC vs TTBanner chart's image
Owens Corning
Price$182.60
Change+$3.32 (+1.85%)
Volume$5.3K
Capitalization14.51B
Trane Technologies
Price$389.23
Change+$0.37 (+0.10%)
Volume$10.37K
Capitalization67.38B
OC vs TT Comparison Chart
Loading...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OC vs. TT commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OC is a Hold and TT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (OC: $179.28 vs. TT: $388.86)
Brand notoriety: OC: Notable vs. TT: Not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OC: 58% vs. TT: 96%
Market capitalization -- OC: $14.51B vs. TT: $67.38B
OC [@Building Products] is valued at $14.51B. TT’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $67.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OC is a better buy in the long-term than TT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OC and TT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OC (@Building Products) experienced а +4.47% price change this week, while TT (@Building Products) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +3.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

OC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

TT is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+3.64% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TT($67.4B) has a higher market cap than OC($14.5B). TT has higher P/E ratio than OC: TT (33.38) vs OC (12.85). OC YTD gains are higher at: 5.684 vs. TT (5.282). TT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.15B vs. OC (2.28B). OC has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. TT (1.1B). OC has less debt than TT: OC (3.27B) vs TT (4.78B). TT has higher revenues than OC: TT (17.7B) vs OC (9.68B).
OCTTOC / TT
Capitalization14.5B67.4B22%
EBITDA2.28B3.15B72%
Gain YTD5.6845.282108%
P/E Ratio12.8533.3838%
Revenue9.68B17.7B55%
Total Cash1.62B1.1B147%
Total Debt3.27B4.78B68%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OC vs TT: Fundamental Ratings
OC
TT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
314
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
4928
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2834
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (31) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TT (89) in the null industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TT’s over the last 12 months.

TT's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as OC (7) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

TT's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as OC (49) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

TT's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as OC (51) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

OC's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TT (34) in the null industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to TT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been loosely correlated with MAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OC jumps, then MAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
-0.13%
MAS - OC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
CSL - OC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
FBIN - OC
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
LII - OC
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
AWI - OC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More

TT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TT has been loosely correlated with LII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TT jumps, then LII could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TT
1D Price
Change %
TT100%
+0.86%
LII - TT
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
CARR - TT
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
CSL - TT
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
JCI - TT
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
OC - TT
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More