OBIIF
Price
$29.10
Change
+$1.19 (+4.26%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
14.66B
QH
Price
$1.39
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.66M
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OBIIF vs QH

Header iconOBIIF vs QH Comparison
Open Charts OBIIF vs QHBanner chart's image
Obic
Price$29.10
Change+$1.19 (+4.26%)
Volume$5
Capitalization14.66B
Quhuo
Price$1.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.18K
Capitalization3.66M
OBIIF vs QH Comparison Chart
Loading...
QH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OBIIF vs. QH commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OBIIF is a Hold and QH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (OBIIF: $29.10 vs. QH: $1.38)
Brand notoriety: OBIIF and QH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OBIIF: 5% vs. QH: 115%
Market capitalization -- OBIIF: $14.66B vs. QH: $3.66M
OBIIF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $14.66B. QH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OBIIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OBIIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QH is a better buy in the long-term than OBIIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

OBIIF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QH (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

QH is expected to report earnings on Jun 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.57% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OBIIF($14.7B) has a higher market cap than QH($3.66M). OBIIF has higher P/E ratio than QH: OBIIF (42.55) vs QH (3.21). OBIIF YTD gains are higher at: -3.810 vs. QH (-5.479). OBIIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 63B vs. QH (47.8M). OBIIF has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. QH (178M). OBIIF has higher revenues than QH: OBIIF (97.3B) vs QH (3.69B).
OBIIFQHOBIIF / QH
Capitalization14.7B3.66M401,201%
EBITDA63B47.8M131,799%
Gain YTD-3.810-5.47970%
P/E Ratio42.553.211,327%
Revenue97.3B3.69B2,635%
Total Cash149B178M83,708%
Total DebtN/A104M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OBIIF: Fundamental Ratings
OBIIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA284.9525.44
+9.80%
Tesla
GME27.460.38
+1.40%
GameStop Corp
SPY550.643.95
+0.72%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL209.280.91
+0.44%
Apple
BTC.X93754.840000-892.085940
-0.94%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

OBIIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OBIIF has been loosely correlated with QH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OBIIF jumps, then QH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OBIIF
1D Price
Change %
OBIIF100%
N/A
QH - OBIIF
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
WRDLY - OBIIF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
CETX - OBIIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACCS - OBIIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
ORCL - OBIIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
More

QH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QH has been loosely correlated with OBIIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QH jumps, then OBIIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QH
1D Price
Change %
QH100%
-4.50%
OBIIF - QH
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRXXF - QH
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDC - QH
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
APCX - QH
28%
Poorly correlated
-11.39%
EGHSF - QH
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
More