Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OAYBX vs RLBAX
OAYBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts OAYBX vs RLBAX
Oakmark Equity and Income Advisor
Price$38.08
Change+$0.19 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.29B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.59
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
OAYBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OAYBX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OAYBX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. OAYBX (6.29B). OAYBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: OAYBX (2.32) vs RLBAX (1.15). OAYBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: OAYBX (9 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than OAYBX (0.62). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. OAYBX (38.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OAYBX: RLBAX (250) vs OAYBX (100000). OAYBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. RLBAX (9.12). OAYBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.27 vs. RLBAX (35.40).
| OAYBX | RLBAX | OAYBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.491 | 10.805 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.29B | 259B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 1.15 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.74 | 9.12 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.61 | 37.15 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.27 | 35.40 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers