OAOFY
Price
$9.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.35B
65 days until earnings call
PCCYF
Price
$0.94
Change
+$0.02 (+2.17%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
204.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OAOFY vs PCCYF

Header iconOAOFY vs PCCYF Comparison
Open Charts OAOFY vs PCCYFBanner chart's image
PJSC Tatneft
Price$9.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization3.35B
PetroChina
Price$0.94
Change+$0.02 (+2.17%)
Volume$1.95K
Capitalization204.53B
OAOFY vs PCCYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PCCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OAOFY vs. PCCYF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OAOFY is a Hold and PCCYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (OAOFY: $9.55 vs. PCCYF: $0.94)
Brand notoriety: OAOFY and PCCYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Market capitalization -- OAOFY: $3.35B vs. PCCYF: $204.53B
OAOFY [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $3.35B. PCCYF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $204.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $499.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $57.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OAOFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePCCYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OAOFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PCCYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the long-term than OAOFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCCYF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PCCYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

OAOFY (@Integrated Oil) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PCCYF (@Integrated Oil) price change was -0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

OAOFY is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+1.68% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCCYF($205B) has a higher market cap than OAOFY($3.35B). PCCYF has higher P/E ratio than OAOFY: PCCYF (7.75) vs OAOFY (1.17). PCCYF YTD gains are higher at: 22.727 vs. OAOFY (0.000).
OAOFYPCCYFOAOFY / PCCYF
Capitalization3.35B205B2%
EBITDAN/A486B-
Gain YTD0.00022.727-
P/E Ratio1.177.7515%
RevenueN/A2.83T-
Total CashN/A294B-
Total DebtN/A369B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OAOFY vs PCCYF: Fundamental Ratings
OAOFY
PCCYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9361
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
4269
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
502

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OAOFY's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (12). This means that OAOFY’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OAOFY (100). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OAOFY’s over the last 12 months.

OAOFY's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (69). This means that OAOFY’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as OAOFY (71). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to OAOFY’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OAOFY (100). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew significantly faster than OAOFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OAOFYPCCYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDXAY13.000.32
+2.52%
Sodexo
TRDTF0.710.01
+1.25%
Trident Resources Corp.
IPCFF17.35N/A
N/A
International Petroleum Corp. CDA
WDGJY1.00N/A
N/A
Wood Group (John) Plc.
AATRL63.00N/A
N/A
AMG Capital Trust II

OAOFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OAOFY and PCCYF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OAOFY and PCCYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OAOFY
1D Price
Change %
OAOFY100%
N/A
PCCYF - OAOFY
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
GLPEY - OAOFY
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
OMVJF - OAOFY
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
MGYOY - OAOFY
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
OMVKY - OAOFY
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
More

PCCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCCYF and SNPMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCCYF and SNPMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCCYF
1D Price
Change %
PCCYF100%
+2.86%
SNPMF - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EC - PCCYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
OAOFY - PCCYF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLPEY - PCCYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
REPYF - PCCYF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
More