Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OANLX vs RWMHX
OANLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts OANLX vs RWMHX
Oakmark Select Institutional
Price$84.50
Change-$0.61 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.61B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.73
Change-$0.95 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
OANLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OANLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OANLX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. OANLX (7.61B). RWMHX pays higher dividends than OANLX: RWMHX (1.33) vs OANLX (0.50). OANLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: OANLX (9 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). OANLX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). OANLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than OANLX: RWMHX (250) vs OANLX (250000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. OANLX (2.72). OANLX return over 5 years is better than : 95.35 vs. RWMHX (44.77).
| OANLX | RWMHX | OANLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.41 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.41 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 9.812 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.61B | 209B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.33 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.72 | 3.83 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.94 | 31.41 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.35 | 44.77 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers