OAKU
Price
$12.00
Change
-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
64.3M
TLGYF
Price
$13.00
Change
+$0.92 (+7.62%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
77.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OAKU vs TLGYF

Header iconOAKU vs TLGYF Comparison
Open Charts OAKU vs TLGYFBanner chart's image
Oak Woods Acquisition
Price$12.00
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Volume$104
Capitalization64.3M
TLGY Acquisition
Price$13.00
Change+$0.92 (+7.62%)
Volume$3.73K
Capitalization77.21M
OAKU vs TLGYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TLGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OAKU vs. TLGYF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OAKU is a Hold and TLGYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (OAKU: $12.00 vs. TLGYF: $13.00)
Brand notoriety: OAKU and TLGYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OAKU: 3% vs. TLGYF: 85%
Market capitalization -- OAKU: $64.3M vs. TLGYF: $77.21M
OAKU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $64.3M. TLGYF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $77.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $174.23M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OAKU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLGYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OAKU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLGYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OAKU and TLGYF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TLGYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TLGYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

OAKU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TLGYF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.64% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLGYF($77.2M) has a higher market cap than OAKU($64.3M). TLGYF has higher P/E ratio than OAKU: TLGYF (76.67) vs OAKU (16.67). TLGYF YTD gains are higher at: 11.684 vs. OAKU (5.727). TLGYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -898K vs. OAKU (-2.66M). TLGYF has more cash in the bank: 208K vs. OAKU (90.9K). OAKU has less debt than TLGYF: OAKU (1.61M) vs TLGYF (4.87M). OAKU (0) and TLGYF (0) have equivalent revenues.
OAKUTLGYFOAKU / TLGYF
Capitalization64.3M77.2M83%
EBITDA-2.66M-898K296%
Gain YTD5.72711.68449%
P/E Ratio16.6776.6722%
Revenue00-
Total Cash90.9K208K44%
Total Debt1.61M4.87M33%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLGYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TLGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSEIX12.850.18
+1.42%
Hartford Small Cap Value I
IHSVX30.850.36
+1.18%
Hartford Small Company R6
FSOAX44.320.49
+1.12%
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies A
SPXUX17.510.10
+0.56%
WisdomTree 500 Digital N/A
WSTRX57.510.08
+0.14%
Macquarie Science and Technology R

OAKU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OAKU and CUBWU have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OAKU and CUBWU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OAKU
1D Price
Change %
OAKU100%
-0.41%
CUBWU - OAKU
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGYF - OAKU
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.62%
HAIUF - OAKU
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMCU - OAKU
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESHA - OAKU
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More

TLGYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLGYF has been loosely correlated with HYAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLGYF jumps, then HYAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLGYF
1D Price
Change %
TLGYF100%
+7.62%
HYAC - TLGYF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ILXP - TLGYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKU - TLGYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
RRACF - TLGYF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAIAF - TLGYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More