Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OAKGX vs TEDSX
OAKGX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts OAKGX vs TEDSX
Oakmark Global Investor
Price$40.00
Change+$2.33 (+6.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.38
Change-$0.11 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.71B
OAKGX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OAKGX vs. TEDSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OAKGX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.71B vs. OAKGX (1.14B). OAKGX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: OAKGX (1.08) vs TEDSX (0.79). OAKGX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: OAKGX (27 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than OAKGX (1.12). OAKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). OAKGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEDSX: OAKGX (0) vs TEDSX (1000). OAKGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.78 vs. TEDSX (11.97). OAKGX return over 5 years is better than : 23.71 vs. TEDSX (16.32).
| OAKGX | TEDSX | OAKGX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.96 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.96 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.354 | 3.450 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 9.71B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.79 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.78 | 11.97 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.65 | 15.51 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.71 | 16.32 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.53 | 29.34 | 288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement