Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NZUS vs SCHG
NZUS vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts NZUS vs SCHG
Stt Strt® SPDR® MSCI USA ClmtPrsAlgd ETF
Price$36.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$514
Net Assets2.91M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$33.09
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$6.26M
Net Assets53.56B
NZUS vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NZUS vs. SCHG commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NZUS is a Buy and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 53.6B vs. NZUS (2.91M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than NZUS: SCHG (19.080) vs NZUS (15.066). NZUS was incepted earlier than SCHG: NZUS (4 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than NZUS (0.10). SCHG has a higher turnover NZUS (13.00) vs NZUS (13.00).
| NZUS | SCHG | NZUS / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 15.066 | 19.080 | 79% |
| Net Assets | 2.91M | 53.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.10 | 0.04 | 250% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 27.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 5.24 | 0.36 | 1,474% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NZUS | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
NZUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NZUS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NZUS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NZUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NZUS | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| SNPS - NZUS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MSFT - NZUS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| KLAC - NZUS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| MPWR - NZUS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| AMZN - NZUS | 68% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||