NZTCF
Price
$1.32
Change
-$0.04 (-2.94%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
PCWLF
Price
$0.67
Change
+$0.04 (+6.35%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NZTCF vs PCWLF

Header iconNZTCF vs PCWLF Comparison
Open Charts NZTCF vs PCWLFBanner chart's image
Spark New Zealand
Price$1.32
Change-$0.04 (-2.94%)
Volume$70.2K
Capitalization2.57B
PCCW
Price$0.67
Change+$0.04 (+6.35%)
Volume$240
Capitalization5.17B
NZTCF vs PCWLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NZTCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NZTCF vs. PCWLF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NZTCF is a Hold and PCWLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NZTCF: $1.32 vs. PCWLF: $0.67)
Brand notoriety: NZTCF and PCWLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NZTCF: 716% vs. PCWLF: 12%
Market capitalization -- NZTCF: $2.57B vs. PCWLF: $5.17B
NZTCF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $2.57B. PCWLF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $5.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NZTCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePCWLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NZTCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PCWLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NZTCF is a better buy in the long-term than PCWLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NZTCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCWLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NZTCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PCWLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCWLF is a better buy in the short-term than NZTCF.

Price Growth

NZTCF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while PCWLF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.03% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCWLF($5.17B) has a higher market cap than NZTCF($2.57B). PCWLF YTD gains are higher at: 13.894 vs. NZTCF (-19.512). PCWLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.8B vs. NZTCF (1.04B). PCWLF has more cash in the bank: 3.14B vs. NZTCF (34M). NZTCF has less debt than PCWLF: NZTCF (2.35B) vs PCWLF (59.3B). PCWLF has higher revenues than NZTCF: PCWLF (38.8B) vs NZTCF (3.62B).
NZTCFPCWLFNZTCF / PCWLF
Capitalization2.57B5.17B50%
EBITDA1.04B5.8B18%
Gain YTD-19.51213.894-140%
P/E Ratio16.64N/A-
Revenue3.62B38.8B9%
Total Cash34M3.14B1%
Total Debt2.35B59.3B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NZTCF vs PCWLF: Fundamental Ratings
NZTCF
PCWLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
88100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5485
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3541

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCWLF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as NZTCF (35). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew similarly to NZTCF’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as NZTCF (100). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew similarly to NZTCF’s over the last 12 months.

NZTCF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PCWLF (100). This means that NZTCF’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

PCWLF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as NZTCF (60). This means that PCWLF’s stock grew similarly to NZTCF’s over the last 12 months.

NZTCF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as PCWLF (85). This means that NZTCF’s stock grew similarly to PCWLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NZTCFPCWLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NZTCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QVAL46.540.55
+1.19%
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Val ETF
IGLB51.330.09
+0.18%
iShares 10+ Year Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
AJUL28.560.03
+0.12%
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF - 2Yr toJul26
MBNE29.08N/A
-0.02%
SPDR® Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF
TIPZ53.65-0.03
-0.06%
PIMCO Broad US TIPS ETF

NZTCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NZTCF and MYTAY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NZTCF and MYTAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NZTCF
1D Price
Change %
NZTCF100%
-2.94%
MYTAY - NZTCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHTCF - NZTCF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTITF - NZTCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUVR - NZTCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
NPPXF - NZTCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+11.83%
More

PCWLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCWLF and SHEN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCWLF and SHEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCWLF
1D Price
Change %
PCWLF100%
+6.50%
SHEN - PCWLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
MTNOY - PCWLF
16%
Poorly correlated
+4.41%
MYTAY - PCWLF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPXF - PCWLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+11.83%
NZTCF - PCWLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
More