NZSTF
Price
$0.87
Change
-$0.07 (-7.45%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
270.98M
OSCUF
Price
$11.18
Change
+$0.68 (+6.48%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.62B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NZSTF vs OSCUF

Header iconNZSTF vs OSCUF Comparison
Open Charts NZSTF vs OSCUFBanner chart's image
NZX
Price$0.87
Change-$0.07 (-7.45%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization270.98M
Japan Exchange Group
Price$11.18
Change+$0.68 (+6.48%)
Volume$460
Capitalization10.62B
NZSTF vs OSCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NZSTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NZSTF vs. OSCUF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NZSTF is a Hold and OSCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NZSTF: $0.87 vs. OSCUF: $11.18)
Brand notoriety: NZSTF and OSCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NZSTF: 100% vs. OSCUF: 19%
Market capitalization -- NZSTF: $270.98M vs. OSCUF: $10.62B
NZSTF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $270.98M. OSCUF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $10.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $164.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NZSTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOSCUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NZSTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OSCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NZSTF is a better buy in the long-term than OSCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NZSTF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSCUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NZSTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • OSCUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NZSTF is a better buy in the short-term than OSCUF.

Price Growth

NZSTF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OSCUF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +4.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.40% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSCUF($10.6B) has a higher market cap than NZSTF($271M). OSCUF has higher P/E ratio than NZSTF: OSCUF (28.18) vs NZSTF (26.41). NZSTF YTD gains are higher at: -2.171 vs. OSCUF (-9.839). OSCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 109B vs. NZSTF (56.3M). OSCUF has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. NZSTF (48.8M). NZSTF has less debt than OSCUF: NZSTF (81.2M) vs OSCUF (52.5B). OSCUF has higher revenues than NZSTF: OSCUF (162B) vs NZSTF (121M).
NZSTFOSCUFNZSTF / OSCUF
Capitalization271M10.6B3%
EBITDA56.3M109B0%
Gain YTD-2.171-9.83922%
P/E Ratio26.4128.1894%
Revenue121M162B0%
Total Cash48.8M243B0%
Total Debt81.2M52.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NZSTF vs OSCUF: Fundamental Ratings
NZSTF
OSCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
4554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2060
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
839

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OSCUF's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as NZSTF (91). This means that OSCUF’s stock grew similarly to NZSTF’s over the last 12 months.

NZSTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (100). This means that NZSTF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

NZSTF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (54). This means that NZSTF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

OSCUF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as NZSTF (57). This means that OSCUF’s stock grew similarly to NZSTF’s over the last 12 months.

NZSTF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSCUF (60). This means that NZSTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NZSTFOSCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NZSTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACFFX28.660.13
+0.46%
Columbia Acorn International Sel Inst
CHUSX30.500.08
+0.26%
Alger Global Equity A
RLACX26.050.04
+0.15%
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity A
IASTX24.500.03
+0.12%
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl R6
BBTLX16.18-0.05
-0.31%
Bridge Builder Tax Managed Large Cap

NZSTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NZSTF and SPXCY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NZSTF and SPXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NZSTF
1D Price
Change %
NZSTF100%
N/A
SPXCY - NZSTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
OSCUF - NZSTF
9%
Poorly correlated
+6.48%
SLNH - NZSTF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
MCQEF - NZSTF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHMAF - NZSTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OSCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OSCUF and MCQEF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSCUF and MCQEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSCUF
1D Price
Change %
OSCUF100%
+6.48%
MCQEF - OSCUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHMAF - OSCUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXCY - OSCUF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
NPPTF - OSCUF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
NZSTF - OSCUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More