NZERF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
7.58M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTYP
Price
$59.50
Change
+$2.80 (+4.94%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NZERF vs TTYP

Header iconNZERF vs TTYP Comparison
Open Charts NZERF vs TTYPBanner chart's image
New Zealand Energy
Price$0.22
Change-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Volume$15.1K
Capitalization7.58M
Trinity Petroleum Trust
Price$59.50
Change+$2.80 (+4.94%)
Volume$550
CapitalizationN/A
NZERF vs TTYP Comparison Chart in %
NZERF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTYP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NZERF vs. TTYP commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NZERF is a Buy and TTYP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (NZERF: $0.20 vs. TTYP: $53.45)
Brand notoriety: NZERF and TTYP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NZERF: 87% vs. TTYP: 218%
Market capitalization -- NZERF: $7.58M vs. TTYP: $0
NZERF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $7.58M. TTYP’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $129.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NZERF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTYP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NZERF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TTYP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NZERF is a better buy in the long-term than TTYP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NZERF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTYP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NZERF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TTYP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTYP is a better buy in the short-term than NZERF.

Price Growth

NZERF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +15.37% price change this week, while TTYP (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.30% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NZERF YTD gains are higher at: 8.704 vs. TTYP (2.004).
NZERFTTYPNZERF / TTYP
Capitalization7.58MN/A-
EBITDA-5.57MN/A-
Gain YTD8.7042.004434%
P/E Ratio3.78N/A-
Revenue1.17MN/A-
Total Cash568KN/A-
Total Debt60.6KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NZERF vs TTYP: Fundamental Ratings
NZERF
TTYP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3346
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTYP's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NZERF (47). This means that TTYP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NZERF’s over the last 12 months.

TTYP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NZERF (100). This means that TTYP’s stock grew similarly to NZERF’s over the last 12 months.

NZERF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as TTYP (100). This means that NZERF’s stock grew similarly to TTYP’s over the last 12 months.

TTYP's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as NZERF (62). This means that TTYP’s stock grew similarly to NZERF’s over the last 12 months.

NZERF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TTYP (100). This means that NZERF’s stock grew significantly faster than TTYP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NZERFTTYP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NZERF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTYP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRM26.620.42
+1.60%
Perimeter Solutions Inc
CAC49.680.53
+1.08%
Camden National Corp
XYZ56.79-3.61
-5.98%
Block Inc
NNOX2.55-0.17
-6.25%
NANO-X IMAGING Ltd
SFHG0.61-0.04
-6.66%
Samfine Creation Holdings Group Ltd

NZERF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NZERF and ZPHRF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NZERF and ZPHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NZERF
1D Price
Change %
NZERF100%
N/A
ZPHRF - NZERF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
TTYP - NZERF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DELKY - NZERF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
PTCO - NZERF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
SRLY - NZERF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TTYP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTYP has been loosely correlated with BLMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTYP jumps, then BLMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTYP
1D Price
Change %
TTYP100%
N/A
BLMC - TTYP
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RUBLF - TTYP
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.41%
ZPTAF - TTYP
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.79%
NZERF - TTYP
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGNNF - TTYP
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More