NYC
Price
$10.29
Change
-$0.24 (-2.28%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
27.5M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZDPY
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.02 (-4.55%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NYC vs ZDPY

Header iconNYC vs ZDPY Comparison
Open Charts NYC vs ZDPYBanner chart's image
American Strategic Investment
Price$10.29
Change-$0.24 (-2.28%)
Volume$5.28K
Capitalization27.5M
Zoned Properties
Price$0.42
Change-$0.02 (-4.55%)
Volume$12.46K
Capitalization5.08M
NYC vs ZDPY Comparison Chart in %
NYC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZDPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NYC vs. ZDPY commentary
Jan 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NYC is a Buy and ZDPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2026
Stock price -- (NYC: $10.29 vs. ZDPY: $0.42)
Brand notoriety: NYC and ZDPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NYC: 111% vs. ZDPY: 82%
Market capitalization -- NYC: $27.5M vs. ZDPY: $5.08M
NYC [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $27.5M. ZDPY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $5.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NYC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZDPY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NYC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZDPY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NYC is a better buy in the long-term than ZDPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NYC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZDPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NYC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZDPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NYC is a better buy in the short-term than ZDPY.

Price Growth

NYC (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +2.90% price change this week, while ZDPY (@Real Estate Development) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.38% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NYC($27.5M) has a higher market cap than ZDPY($5.08M). NYC YTD gains are higher at: 24.143 vs. ZDPY (-10.700). NYC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2M vs. ZDPY (1.92M). NYC has more cash in the bank: 3.36M vs. ZDPY (1.11M). ZDPY has less debt than NYC: ZDPY (9.33M) vs NYC (349M). NYC has higher revenues than ZDPY: NYC (51.7M) vs ZDPY (4.16M).
NYCZDPYNYC / ZDPY
Capitalization27.5M5.08M542%
EBITDA16.2M1.92M846%
Gain YTD24.143-10.700-226%
P/E RatioN/A7.03-
Revenue51.7M4.16M1,243%
Total Cash3.36M1.11M301%
Total Debt349M9.33M3,743%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NYC vs ZDPY: Fundamental Ratings
NYC
ZDPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1363
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9658
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10063
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NYC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZDPY (84). This means that NYC’s stock grew significantly faster than ZDPY’s over the last 12 months.

NYC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ZDPY (100). This means that NYC’s stock grew similarly to ZDPY’s over the last 12 months.

ZDPY's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NYC (96). This means that ZDPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NYC’s over the last 12 months.

NYC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as ZDPY (61). This means that NYC’s stock grew similarly to ZDPY’s over the last 12 months.

ZDPY's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NYC (100). This means that ZDPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NYC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NYCZDPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NYC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZDPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GM80.933.12
+4.01%
General Motors Company
VTOL41.651.37
+3.40%
Bristow Group
AUGO65.541.26
+1.95%
Aura Minerals Inc
RENT7.47-0.22
-2.86%
Rent the Runway
EKSO7.85-0.37
-4.50%
Ekso Bionics Holdings Inc

NYC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NYC and DHC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NYC and DHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NYC
1D Price
Change %
NYC100%
-2.28%
DHC - NYC
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
DBRG - NYC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
HOUS - NYC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIRE - NYC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
GBR - NYC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More

ZDPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZDPY and WRFRF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZDPY and WRFRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZDPY
1D Price
Change %
ZDPY100%
-4.11%
WRFRF - ZDPY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VONOY - ZDPY
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
VNNVF - ZDPY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NYC - ZDPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
OPEN - ZDPY
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More