Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs VIGRX
NWZMX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs VIGRX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$21.21
Change+$0.20 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.15M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$227.62
Change+$2.45 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.94B
NWZMX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. VIGRX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 294B vs. NWZMX (213M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: VIGRX (0.34) vs NWZMX (0.00). NWZMX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWZMX (8 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). NWZMX (0.91) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). VIGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: VIGRX (3000) vs NWZMX (1000000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.43 vs. NWZMX (12.58). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 115.36 vs. NWZMX (46.99).
| NWZMX | VIGRX | NWZMX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.17 | 482% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.17 | 535% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.067 | 7.729 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 294B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.58 | 15.43 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.50 | 96.40 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.99 | 115.36 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 312.81 | - |